Predictors of success following endovascular aneurysm repair: mid-term results

Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2006 Feb;31(2):123-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2005.08.013. Epub 2005 Oct 3.

Abstract

Objective: Australian cases of endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) performed between 1999 and 2001 have been evaluated to determine the mid-term (6 months to 5 years) safety and efficacy of the procedure. This study looks at predictors of success, based on mid-term follow-up data.

Design of study: This study uses results obtained from a prospective semi-voluntary register (audit) of Australian data obtained from surgeons in the private and public sector.

Results: Peri-operative mortality for patients enrolled in the audit was 1.8%. Ninety-three percent of procedures were technically successful (890/961). Nearly 13% of patients have had re-interventions (mostly endoluminal) at follow-up. Analysis of audit data shows that the likelihood of experiencing post-operative complications or requiring additional procedures increases with ASA rating, increasing age, large pre-operative aneurysm size, aneurysm angle >45 degrees and number of co-morbid conditions diagnosed.

Conclusions: This study confirms satisfactory mid-term results in a, national rather than unit specific, setting. Predictors of clinical failure or need for re-intervention include large aneurysm size, neck angulation >or=45 degrees and short infrarenal neck.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Aged
  • Aortic Aneurysm / surgery*
  • Blood Vessel Prosthesis*
  • Evidence-Based Medicine
  • Female
  • Follow-Up Studies
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Postoperative Complications
  • Reoperation
  • Stents*
  • Treatment Outcome