The case for integrating grounded theory and participatory action research: empowering clients to inform professional practice

Qual Health Res. 2005 Oct;15(8):1129-40. doi: 10.1177/1049732305275882.

Abstract

Grounded theory and participatory action research methods are distinct approaches to qualitative inquiry. Although grounded theory has been conceptualized in constructivist terms, it has elements of positivist thinking with an image of neutral search for objective truth through rigorous data collection and analysis. Participatory action research is based on a critique of this image and calls for more inclusive research processes. It questions the possibility of objective social sciences and aspires to engage people actively in all stages of generating knowledge. The authors applied both approaches in a project designed to explore the experiences of female survivors of childhood sexual abuse with physical therapy and subsequently develop a handbook on sensitive practice for clinicians that takes into consideration the needs and perspectives of these clients. Building on this experience, they argue that the integration of grounded theory and participatory action research can empower clients to inform professional practice.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Child
  • Child Abuse, Sexual
  • Female
  • Health Services Research*
  • Humans
  • Interviews as Topic
  • Ontario
  • Patient Participation*
  • Physical Therapy Specialty
  • Practice Patterns, Physicians'*
  • Saskatchewan
  • Survivors*