Can low-density lipoprotein be too low? The safety and efficacy of achieving very low low-density lipoprotein with intensive statin therapy: a PROVE IT-TIMI 22 substudy
- PMID: 16226163
- DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2005.04.064
Can low-density lipoprotein be too low? The safety and efficacy of achieving very low low-density lipoprotein with intensive statin therapy: a PROVE IT-TIMI 22 substudy
Erratum in
- J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006 Jan 17;47(2):472
Abstract
Objectives: This study sought to evaluate the safety and efficacy of achieving very low calculated low-density lipoprotein (LDL) levels with intensive statin therapy.
Background: Intensive statin therapy reduces clinical events occurring after acute coronary syndrome (ACS) and may result in LDL levels markedly lower than guideline levels. Prior epidemiologic and preclinical studies raise concerns about the safety of very low cholesterol levels.
Methods: The Pravastatin or Atorvastatin Evaluation and Infection Therapy-Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction 22 (PROVE IT-TIMI 22) study compared intensive therapy (atorvastatin, 80 mg) and moderate therapy (pravastatin, 40 mg) in patients after ACS. Patients treated with atorvastatin were divided by four-month LDL values into groups: >100, >80 to 100 (reference-range-meeting guidelines), >60 to 80, >40 to 60, and <40 mg/dl. Baseline, clinical, and safety data were compared among groups achieving guideline recommendation levels or lower.
Results: Among 1,825 patients with four-month LDL, 91% were at goal (<100 mg/dl). The distribution was >80 to 100 mg/dl (14%), >60 to 80 mg/dl (31%), >40 to 60 mg/dl (34%), and <40 mg/dl (11%). Those with lower LDL levels were more often male, older, and diabetic, and had lower baseline LDL levels. They had prior statin therapy and fewer prior myocardial infarctions (MI). There were no significant differences in safety parameters, including muscle, liver, or retinal abnormalities, intracranial hemorrhage, or death, in the very low LDL groups. The <40 mg/dl and 40 to 60 mg/dl groups had fewer major cardiac events (death, MI, stroke, recurrent ischemia, revascularization).
Conclusions: Compared with patients treated with an accepted LDL goal (80 to 100 mg/dl), there was no adverse effect on safety with lower achieved LDL levels, and apparent improved clinical efficacy. These data identify no intrinsic safety concern of achieving low LDL and, therefore, a strategy of intensive treatment need not be altered in patients achieving very low LDL levels.
Similar articles
-
Relationship between uncontrolled risk factors and C-reactive protein levels in patients receiving standard or intensive statin therapy for acute coronary syndromes in the PROVE IT-TIMI 22 trial.J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005 Oct 18;46(8):1417-24. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2005.08.024. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005. PMID: 16226164 Clinical Trial.
-
Improved outcome after acute coronary syndromes with an intensive versus standard lipid-lowering regimen: results from the Pravastatin or Atorvastatin Evaluation and Infection Therapy-Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction 22 (PROVE IT-TIMI 22) trial.Am J Med. 2005 Dec;118 Suppl 12A:28-35. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2005.09.014. Am J Med. 2005. PMID: 16356805
-
Baseline low-density lipoprotein cholesterol is an important predictor of the benefit of intensive lipid-lowering therapy: a PROVE IT-TIMI 22 (Pravastatin or Atorvastatin Evaluation and Infection Therapy-Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction 22) analysis.J Am Coll Cardiol. 2008 Sep 9;52(11):914-20. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2008.05.046. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2008. PMID: 18772061 Clinical Trial.
-
Early time to benefit with intensive statin treatment: could it be the pleiotropic effects?Am J Cardiol. 2005 Sep 5;96(5A):54F-60F. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2005.06.027. Am J Cardiol. 2005. PMID: 16126024 Review.
-
Effect of intensive lipid lowering on progression of coronary atherosclerosis: evidence for an early benefit from the Reversal of Atherosclerosis with Aggressive Lipid Lowering (REVERSAL) trial.Am J Cardiol. 2005 Sep 5;96(5A):61F-68F. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2005.07.013. Am J Cardiol. 2005. PMID: 16126025 Review.
Cited by
-
Low LDL-C: Is It all Good News?Curr Atheroscler Rep. 2024 Dec;26(12):673-681. doi: 10.1007/s11883-024-01238-y. Epub 2024 Sep 10. Curr Atheroscler Rep. 2024. PMID: 39254830 Review.
-
Navigating Lipodystrophy: Insights from Laminopathies and Beyond.Int J Mol Sci. 2024 Jul 23;25(15):8020. doi: 10.3390/ijms25158020. Int J Mol Sci. 2024. PMID: 39125589 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Review of Evolocumab for the Reduction of LDL Cholesterol and Secondary Prevention of Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease.Rev Cardiovasc Med. 2024 May 23;25(5):190. doi: 10.31083/j.rcm2505190. eCollection 2024 May. Rev Cardiovasc Med. 2024. PMID: 39076473 Free PMC article. Review.
-
There are those who would like zero LDL cholesterol.Eur Heart J Suppl. 2024 Apr 17;26(Suppl 1):i19-i22. doi: 10.1093/eurheartjsupp/suae012. eCollection 2024 Apr. Eur Heart J Suppl. 2024. PMID: 38867858 Free PMC article.
-
Evolution of More Aggressive LDL-Cholesterol Targets and Therapies for Cardiovascular Disease Prevention.J Clin Med. 2023 Nov 30;12(23):7432. doi: 10.3390/jcm12237432. J Clin Med. 2023. PMID: 38068483 Free PMC article. Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
