Prevention of upper respiratory tract infections by gargling: a randomized trial
- PMID: 16242593
- DOI: 10.1016/j.amepre.2005.06.013
Prevention of upper respiratory tract infections by gargling: a randomized trial
Abstract
Background: Gargling to wash the throat is commonly performed in Japan, and people believe that such hygienic routine, especially with gargle medicine, prevents upper respiratory tract infections (URTIs). Its effectiveness, however, has not been established by clinical trials.
Design: Randomized controlled trial carried out in 2002-2003 winter season and analyzed in 2003 and 2004.
Participants: Healthy volunteers (387) aged 18 to 65 years.
Intervention: Participants were randomly assigned to water gargling, povidone-iodine gargling, and usual care (control). Subjects in the two gargling groups were requested to gargle with water or diluted povidone-iodine at least three times a day. Participants were followed for 60 days.
Main outcome measures: The primary outcome measure was first URTI incidence. Severity of URTI symptoms among incident cases was also evaluated. Both outcomes were assessed with a self-administered symptom record. Analyses were performed on an intention-to-treat basis.
Results: A total of 130 participants contracted URTIs. The incidence rate of first URTI was 0.26 episodes/30 person-days among control subjects. The rate decreased to 0.17 episodes/30 person-days in the water gargling group, and 0.24 episodes/30 person-days in the povidone-iodine gargling group. Respective incidence rate ratios against controls were 0.64 (95% confidence interval [CI]=0.41-0.99) and 0.89 (95% CI=0.60-1.33). A Cox regression (proportional hazard model) revealed the efficacy of water gargling (hazard ratio=0.60, 95% CI=0.39-0.95). Even when a URTI occurred, water gargling tended to attenuate bronchial symptoms (p=0.055).
Conclusions: Simple water gargling was effective to prevent URTIs among healthy people. This virtually cost-free modality would appreciably benefit the general population.
Similar articles
-
Cost-effectiveness of gargling for the prevention of upper respiratory tract infections.BMC Health Serv Res. 2008 Dec 16;8:258. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-8-258. BMC Health Serv Res. 2008. PMID: 19087312 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Gargling with povidone-iodine reduces the transport of bacteria during oral intubation.Can J Anaesth. 2004 Nov;51(9):932-6. doi: 10.1007/BF03018895. Can J Anaesth. 2004. PMID: 15525622 Clinical Trial.
-
Prevention of respiratory infections by povidone-iodine gargle.Dermatology. 2002;204 Suppl 1:32-6. doi: 10.1159/000057722. Dermatology. 2002. PMID: 12011518
-
Povidone iodine-induced overt hypothyroidism in a patient with prolonged habitual gargling: urinary excretion of iodine after gargling in normal subjects.Intern Med. 2007;46(7):391-5. doi: 10.2169/internalmedicine.46.1899. Epub 2007 Apr 2. Intern Med. 2007. PMID: 17409604 Review.
-
Preventive effects of tea and tea catechins against influenza and acute upper respiratory tract infections: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Eur J Nutr. 2021 Dec;60(8):4189-4202. doi: 10.1007/s00394-021-02681-2. Epub 2021 Sep 22. Eur J Nutr. 2021. PMID: 34550452 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Impact of Steam Inhalation, Saline Gargling, and Povidone-Iodine Gargling on Clinical Outcome of COVID-19 Patients in Bengaluru, Karnataka: A Randomized Control Trial.Indian J Community Med. 2022 Apr-Jun;47(2):207-212. doi: 10.4103/ijcm.ijcm_804_21. Epub 2022 Jul 11. Indian J Community Med. 2022. PMID: 36034257 Free PMC article.
-
Bacterial and fungal isolation from face masks under the COVID-19 pandemic.Sci Rep. 2022 Jul 18;12(1):11361. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-15409-x. Sci Rep. 2022. PMID: 35851044 Free PMC article.
-
Unintended beneficial effects of COVID-19 on influenza-associated emergency department use in Korea.Am J Emerg Med. 2022 Sep;59:1-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2022.06.039. Epub 2022 Jun 26. Am J Emerg Med. 2022. PMID: 35772222 Free PMC article.
-
Survey of potentially inappropriate prescriptions for common cold symptoms in Japan: A cross-sectional study.PLoS One. 2022 May 12;17(5):e0265874. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0265874. eCollection 2022. PLoS One. 2022. PMID: 35552542 Free PMC article.
-
Exploring the effects of COVID-19 restrictions on wellbeing across different styles of lockdown.Health Psychol Open. 2022 May 7;9(1):20551029221099800. doi: 10.1177/20551029221099800. eCollection 2022 Jan-Jun. Health Psychol Open. 2022. PMID: 35547558 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
