Voriconazole versus a regimen of amphotericin B followed by fluconazole for candidaemia in non-neutropenic patients: a randomised non-inferiority trial
- PMID: 16243088
- DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)67490-9
Voriconazole versus a regimen of amphotericin B followed by fluconazole for candidaemia in non-neutropenic patients: a randomised non-inferiority trial
Abstract
Background: Voriconazole has proven efficacy against invasive aspergillosis and oesophageal candidiasis. This multicentre, randomised, non-inferiority study compared voriconazole with a regimen of amphotericin B followed by fluconazole for the treatment of candidaemia in non-neutropenic patients.
Methods: Non-neutropenic patients with a positive blood culture for a species of candida and clinical evidence of infection were enrolled. Patients were randomly assigned, in a 2:1 ratio, either voriconazole (n=283) or amphotericin B followed by fluconazole (n=139). The primary efficacy analysis was based on clinical and mycological response 12 weeks after the end of treatment, assessed by an independent data-review committee unaware of treatment assignment.
Findings: Of 422 patients randomised, 370 were included in the modified intention-to-treat population. Voriconazole was non-inferior to amphotericin B/fluconazole in the primary efficacy analysis, with successful outcomes in 41% of patients in both treatment groups (95% CI for difference -10.6% to 10.6%). At the last evaluable assessment, outcome was successful in 162 (65%) patients assigned voriconazole and 87 (71%) assigned amphotericin B/fluconazole (p=0.25). Voriconazole cleared blood cultures as quickly as amphotericin B/fluconazole (median time to negative blood culture, 2.0 days). Treatment discontinuations due to all-cause adverse events were more frequent in the voriconazole group, although most discontinuations were due to non-drug-related events and there were significantly fewer serious adverse events and cases of renal toxicity than in the amphotericin B/fluconazole group.
Interpretation: Voriconazole was as effective as the regimen of amphotericin B followed by fluconazole in the treatment of candidaemia in non-neutropenic patients, and with fewer toxic effects.
Relevance to practice: There are several options for treatment of candidaemia in non-neutropenic patients, including amphotericin B, fluconazole, voriconazole, and echinocandins. Voriconazole can be given both as initial intravenous treatment and as an oral stepdown agent.
Comment in
-
Voriconazole for candidosis: an important addition?Lancet. 2005 Oct 22-28;366(9495):1413-4. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)67579-4. Lancet. 2005. PMID: 16243074 No abstract available.
-
Candidaemia secondary to intravascular catheter colonisation?Lancet. 2006 Mar 4;367(9512):728-9; author reply 729. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(06)68299-8. Lancet. 2006. PMID: 16517269 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Voriconazole versus amphotericin B or fluconazole in cancer patients with neutropenia.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Feb 24;2014(2):CD004707. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004707.pub3. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014. PMID: 24563222 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Voriconazole versus amphotericin B for primary therapy of invasive aspergillosis.N Engl J Med. 2002 Aug 8;347(6):408-15. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa020191. N Engl J Med. 2002. PMID: 12167683 Clinical Trial.
-
Voriconazole versus amphotericin B in cancer patients with neutropenia.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006 Jan 25;(1):CD004707. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004707.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006. PMID: 16437492 Updated. Review.
-
Antifungal activity of voriconazole (UK-109,496), fluconazole and amphotericin B against hematogenous Candida krusei infection in neutropenic guinea pig model.J Chemother. 1999 Feb;11(1):34-9. doi: 10.1179/joc.1999.11.1.34. J Chemother. 1999. PMID: 10078778
-
[Current treatment of candidemia in non-neutropenic patients. Amphotericin B or fluconazole? A retrospective study of 62 consecutive patients].Rev Clin Esp. 1997 Dec;197(12):799-803. Rev Clin Esp. 1997. PMID: 9477669 Spanish.
Cited by
-
Invasive candidiasis: current clinical challenges and unmet needs in adult populations.J Antimicrob Chemother. 2023 Jul 5;78(7):1569-1585. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkad139. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2023. PMID: 37220664 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Epidemiology, species distribution, antifungal susceptibility, and outcome of candidemia in intensive care units in Isfahan, Iran.Curr Med Mycol. 2022 Sep;8(3):30-34. doi: 10.18502/cmm.8.3.11217. Curr Med Mycol. 2022. PMID: 37051556 Free PMC article.
-
Short Course of Antifungal Therapy in Patients With Uncomplicated Candida Bloodstream Infection: Another Case of Less Is More in the Clinical Setting?Open Forum Infect Dis. 2022 Dec 8;10(1):ofac656. doi: 10.1093/ofid/ofac656. eCollection 2023 Jan. Open Forum Infect Dis. 2022. PMID: 36655192 Free PMC article.
-
Diagnosis and Treatment of Invasive Candidiasis.Antibiotics (Basel). 2022 May 26;11(6):718. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics11060718. Antibiotics (Basel). 2022. PMID: 35740125 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Antifungal Drugs and Drug-Induced Liver Injury: A Real-World Study Leveraging the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System Database.Front Pharmacol. 2022 Apr 28;13:891336. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2022.891336. eCollection 2022. Front Pharmacol. 2022. PMID: 35571077 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
