GMO: human health risk assessment

Review

. 2005 Aug:29 Suppl 2:7-11.

doi: 10.1007/s11259-005-0003-7.

Affiliations

Review

G D'Agnolo. Vet Res Commun. 2005 Aug.

. 2005 Aug:29 Suppl 2:7-11.

doi: 10.1007/s11259-005-0003-7.

¹ Department of Cell Biology and Neuroscienzes, Istituto Superiore di Sanità, Viale Regina Elena 299, 00161, Rome, Italy. dagnolo@iss.it

No abstract available

Similar articles

Improved evaluation of potential allergens in GM food.
Jank B, Haslberger AG. Jank B, et al. Trends Biotechnol. 2003 Jun;21(6):249-50. doi: 10.1016/S0167-7799(03)00090-8. Trends Biotechnol. 2003. PMID: 12788543 No abstract available.
[Assessment of allergenicity of genetically modified food crops].
Schauzu M, Pöting A, Rubin D, Lampen A. Schauzu M, et al. Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz. 2012 Mar;55(3):402-7. doi: 10.1007/s00103-011-1426-7. Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz. 2012. PMID: 22373855 Review. German.
Food labels should state the benefits of GMOs.
Righelato R. Righelato R. Nature. 2002 Sep 26;419(6905):337. doi: 10.1038/419337d. Nature. 2002. PMID: 12353008 No abstract available.
The politics and science behind GMO acceptance.
Varzakas TH, Arvanitoyannis IS, Baltas H. Varzakas TH, et al. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr. 2007;47(4):335-61. doi: 10.1080/10408390600762696. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr. 2007. PMID: 17457721 Review.
Codex guidelines for GM foods include the analysis of unintended effects.
Haslberger AG. Haslberger AG. Nat Biotechnol. 2003 Jul;21(7):739-41. doi: 10.1038/nbt0703-739. Nat Biotechnol. 2003. PMID: 12833088 No abstract available.