Feasibility of management of high-grade cervical lesions in a single visit: a randomized controlled trial
- PMID: 16264159
- DOI: 10.1001/jama.294.17.2182
Feasibility of management of high-grade cervical lesions in a single visit: a randomized controlled trial
Abstract
Context: The incidence of cervical cancer is higher among low-income and minority women who have never undergone a conventional Papanicolaou test or who do not follow up after testing. Screening has been shown to reduce cervical cancer incidence rates.
Objectives: To determine the feasibility and acceptability of immediately treating women with severely abnormal Papanicolaou test results by using a single-visit cervical cancer screening and treatment program and to compare treatment rates and 12-month follow-up rates with those of women who received usual care.
Design, setting, and participants: Randomized controlled trial conducted among 3521 women aged 18 years or older recruited between January 1999 and April 2002 at US community health centers located in predominantly Latino underserved areas.
Interventions: Women randomized to usual care (n = 1805) were discharged immediately after examination. Women randomized to the single-visit group (n = 1716) remained at the clinic until the results of their conventional Papanicolaou test were available. Large loop electrosurgical excision procedure was performed in single-visit patients with either a diagnosis of a high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (HGSIL)/atypical glandular cells of undetermined significance (AGUS) or suspicion of carcinoma. All other patients with abnormal Papanicolaou test results were referred to abnormal cytology clinics or elected to receive follow-up care outside the study's medical system.
Main outcome measures: Treatment rates for HGSIL/AGUS at 6 months, follow-up rates at 6 months for lower-grade lesions, and 1-year follow-up rates for all patients.
Results: The rate of abnormal Papanicolaou test results was 4.1%. One percent of results showed high-grade lesions. In the single-visit group, the mean visit time was 2.8 hours and the mean time for delivery and processing of the Papanicolaou tests was 66 minutes. Six months after randomization, 14 (88%) of 16 single-visit and 10 (53%) of 19 usual care patients with HGSIL/AGUS had completed treatment. Fifty percent in the single-visit program and 53% of usual care with less abnormal Papanicolaou tests completed treatment within 6 months. Overall, 36% in each group presented for a follow-up Papanicolaou test 1 year later. Women in the single-visit group with high-grade lesions (10/16; 63%) were significantly more likely to attend follow-up for Papanicolaou tests 12 months later than women with similar lesions in the usual care group (4/19; 21%).
Conclusions: For cervical cancer screening, the single-visit program was feasible and the degree of acceptability was high in this underserved population. Single visit programs provide an opportunity to increase the rate of immediate treatment and follow-up of women with severely abnormal Papanicolaou test results. This strategy did not improve follow-up rates for women with less-abnormal results. Trial Registration http://ClinicalTrials.govIdentifier: NCT00237562.
Comment in
-
Cervical cancer prevention: making programs more appropriate and pragmatic.JAMA. 2005 Nov 2;294(17):2225-8. doi: 10.1001/jama.294.17.2225. JAMA. 2005. PMID: 16264166 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Low-income minority women at risk for cervical cancer: a process to improve adherence to follow-up recommendations.Public Health Rep. 2001 Nov-Dec;116(6):608-16. doi: 10.1093/phr/116.6.608. Public Health Rep. 2001. PMID: 12196621 Free PMC article.
-
Single-visit program for cervical cancer prevention in a high-risk population.Obstet Gynecol. 1995 Oct;86(4 Pt 1):491-8. doi: 10.1016/0029-7844(95)00204-5. Obstet Gynecol. 1995. PMID: 7675367
-
Follow-up of women with cervical cytological abnormalities showing atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance or low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion: a nationwide cohort study.Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Jan;216(1):48.e1-48.e15. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2016.07.042. Epub 2016 Jul 25. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2017. PMID: 27457115
-
Screening for Cervical Cancer With High-Risk Human Papillomavirus Testing: A Systematic Evidence Review for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force [Internet].Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US); 2018 Aug. Report No.: 17-05231-EF-1. Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US); 2018 Aug. Report No.: 17-05231-EF-1. PMID: 30256575 Free Books & Documents. Review.
-
See, Test & Treat: A 5-Year Experience of Pathologists Driving Cervical and Breast Cancer Screening to Underserved and Underinsured Populations.Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2016 Dec;140(12):1411-1422. doi: 10.5858/arpa.2016-0094-SA. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2016. PMID: 27922769 Review.
Cited by
-
Researchers should no longer delay implementation of Pap screening in low and middle income countries pending research into novel screening approaches.Infect Agent Cancer. 2024 Apr 26;19(1):18. doi: 10.1186/s13027-024-00576-5. Infect Agent Cancer. 2024. PMID: 38671517 Free PMC article.
-
Use of visual inspection with acetic acid, Pap smear, or high-risk human papillomavirus testing in women living with HIV/AIDS for posttreatment cervical cancer screening: same tests, different priorities.AIDS. 2017 Jan 14;31(2):233-240. doi: 10.1097/QAD.0000000000001327. AIDS. 2017. PMID: 28002084 Free PMC article.
-
Factors Associated with Uptake of Visual Inspection with Acetic Acid (VIA) for Cervical Cancer Screening in Western Kenya.PLoS One. 2016 Jun 16;11(6):e0157217. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0157217. eCollection 2016. PLoS One. 2016. PMID: 27310005 Free PMC article.
-
Acceptability and usability of self-collected sampling for HPV testing among African-American women living in the Mississippi Delta.Womens Health Issues. 2013 Mar-Apr;23(2):e123-30. doi: 10.1016/j.whi.2012.12.003. Epub 2013 Feb 12. Womens Health Issues. 2013. PMID: 23410619 Free PMC article.
-
Cervical cancer screening, diagnosis and treatment interventions for racial and ethnic minorities: a systematic review.J Gen Intern Med. 2012 Aug;27(8):1016-32. doi: 10.1007/s11606-012-2052-2. J Gen Intern Med. 2012. PMID: 22798213 Free PMC article. Review.
