An alternative technique for totally implantable central venous access devices. A retrospective study of 1311 cases

Eur J Surg Oncol. 2006 Feb;32(1):90-3. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2005.09.004. Epub 2005 Nov 10.


Aim: The aim of the present study was to report our experience of totally implantable central venous access devices (TICVAD) implantation using two techniques and attempt to define the better technique.

Materials and methods: From January 1998 to September 2003, 1131 patients were reviewed and divided into two groups with implantation by cephalic vein cut-down (group A) done by general surgeons and subclavian vein puncture with the Seldinger technique (group B) done by vascular surgeons. The operative time, early and late complications of these two groups were compared. Data were analysed by Student's t-test.

Results: The average of operative time was 43 min in group A (35-70 min) and 40 min in group B (35-60 min) (P>0.05). No post-operative pneumothorax, hemothorax and fragmentation occurred in group A; the incidence of peri-operative complication was higher in group B. The overall and early complications of group A were significantly lower than that of group B (P<0.0001).

Conclusion: This retrospective study showed that the cephalic vein cut-down approach for TICVAD placement avoided the risks of pneumothorax, hemothorax and catheter fragmentation.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study
  • Evaluation Study

MeSH terms

  • Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation / instrumentation*
  • Catheterization, Central Venous / methods*
  • Catheters, Indwelling*
  • Female
  • Follow-Up Studies
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Punctures
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Subclavian Vein
  • Venous Cutdown