The use of noninvasive diagnostic tools, like the deferoxamine (DFO) test and serum iPTH, to identify aluminum-related bone disease has proved to be inadequate due to false-negative cases; therefore, bone biopsy becomes a necessary diagnostic procedure. Our purpose was to verify whether these non-invasive parameters, appropriately used, may result valid in the identification of patients not at risk of Al toxicity, therefore restricting the need for histologic evaluation. We studied 68 hemodialyzed patients, aged 49.0 +/- 11.6 years, with a M/F ratio of 37/31 and a dialytic age of 85.0 +/- 47.0 months, by means of bone biopsy, DFO test and serum C-PTH. 19.1% of the cases had positive stainable Al and/or high bone Al content (greater than 60 mg/kg/dw) and could be intoxicated. To obtain the highest sensitivity, we selected the following limit values: the lower limit of increment so far proposed for DFO test positivity (greater than 150 micrograms/l) and a value capable of selecting patients with pathologic osteoclasia for C-PTH (greater than 15 ng/ml). With these limits, four different groups of patients were recognized: group A, DFO test positive and PTH high, n = 12; group B, DFO test positive and PTH low, n = 6; group C, DFO test negative and PTH high, n = 30; group D, DFO test negative and PTH low, n = 20. In group B, which could be anticipated as being at higher risk, we actually found the highest (p less than 0.05) bone Al content as compared to other groups, associated with a reduced bone formation rate.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)