The magnet process and the perceived work environment of nurses
- PMID: 16317359
- DOI: 10.1097/00006199-200511000-00004
The magnet process and the perceived work environment of nurses
Abstract
Background: Several studies have described the work environment of nurses from magnet and nonmagnet hospitals, but there have been no studies of nurses from hospitals in the magnet application process.
Objectives: To compare the differences between characteristics of hospitals and nurses from three hospital types: magnet hospitals, hospitals in the process of applying for magnet certification, and nonmagnet hospitals, and how nurses from these hospitals perceive their work environment.
Methods: In a national, cross-sectional survey of critical care nurses, the Perceived Nursing Work Environment (PNWE) instrument was administered to measure nurses' perceptions of their work environment.
Results: Data were available from 2,092 nurse surveys. Over a third of the respondents were from in-process hospitals and almost half were from nonmagnet hospitals. The majority of nurses were female and from large hospitals in the Atlantic region. The mean age of nurses was 39.5 years and the mean years of work experience in the intensive care unit (ICU) was 10.2 years. Higher nurse scores were significantly associated with magnet certification on one subscale of the PNWE, nursing competence.
Discussion: Nurses from magnet hospitals had a positive perception of nursing competence in their work environment. Further research is necessary to examine the nurse work environment and to determine if the characteristics of magnet hospitals have changed.
Similar articles
-
Perceived nursing work environment of critical care nurses.Nurs Res. 2004 Nov-Dec;53(6):370-8. doi: 10.1097/00006199-200411000-00005. Nurs Res. 2004. PMID: 15586133
-
Assessing differences in job satisfaction of nurses in magnet and nonmagnet hospitals.J Nurs Adm. 2002 Nov;32(11):564-76. doi: 10.1097/00005110-200211000-00004. J Nurs Adm. 2002. PMID: 12464774
-
What constitutes effective leadership? Perceptions of magnet and nonmagnet nurse leaders.J Nurs Adm. 2003 Sep;33(9):456-67. doi: 10.1097/00005110-200309000-00006. J Nurs Adm. 2003. PMID: 14501562
-
Application of the Nursing Worklife Model to the ICU setting.Crit Care Nurs Clin North Am. 2008 Dec;20(4):481-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ccell.2008.08.004. Crit Care Nurs Clin North Am. 2008. PMID: 19007714 Review.
-
Is your nursing staff ready for magnet hospital status? An application of the revised Nursing Work Index.J Nurs Adm. 2004 Oct;34(10):463-8. doi: 10.1097/00005110-200410000-00007. J Nurs Adm. 2004. PMID: 15577669 Review.
Cited by
-
Leveraging the Work Environment to Minimize the Negative Impact of Nurse Burnout on Patient Outcomes.Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Jan 12;18(2):610. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18020610. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021. PMID: 33445764 Free PMC article.
-
Research Priorities of Clinical Nurses and Midwives in the Eastern Mediterranean Region: a Mixed Methods Study.J Epidemiol Glob Health. 2019 Mar;9(1):36-43. doi: 10.2991/jegh.k.190314.001. J Epidemiol Glob Health. 2019. PMID: 30932388 Free PMC article.
-
Factors Affecting Resilience and Development of Posttraumatic Stress Disorder in Critical Care Nurses.Am J Crit Care. 2017 May;26(3):184-192. doi: 10.4037/ajcc2017798. Am J Crit Care. 2017. PMID: 28461539 Free PMC article.
-
Does safety climate moderate the influence of staffing adequacy and work conditions on nurse injuries?J Safety Res. 2007;38(4):431-46. doi: 10.1016/j.jsr.2007.04.004. Epub 2007 Jul 25. J Safety Res. 2007. PMID: 17884430 Free PMC article.
-
Nurse working conditions, organizational climate, and intent to leave in ICUs: an instrumental variable approach.Health Serv Res. 2007 Jun;42(3 Pt 1):1085-104. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2006.00651.x. Health Serv Res. 2007. PMID: 17489905 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
