A comparison of two botulinum type a toxin preparations for the treatment of glabellar lines: double-blind, randomized, pilot study

Dermatol Surg. 2005 Dec;31(12):1651-4. doi: 10.2310/6350.2005.31303.

Abstract

Background: Botulinum toxins have been proven effective for reducing facial lines. There are two commercial types of botulinum toxin type A available in many countries but no published comparison studies.

Objective: To compare the efficacy and tolerability of Botox Cosmetic and Dysport 50 U in the treatment of glabellar lines (using 20 U of Botox Cosmetic, which is the dose approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of glabellar lines, and 50 U of Dysport, which has been reported to be the optimal dose for this formulation).

Study design: Parallel-group double-blind pilot study. Evaluation by observing physician, photographic, and patient evaluations.

Conclusion: Botox 20 U provided better and more prolonged efficacy than Dysport 50 U in the treatment of glabellar lines.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study
  • Randomized Controlled Trial
  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Botulinum Toxins, Type A / pharmacology*
  • Double-Blind Method
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Neuromuscular Agents / pharmacology*
  • Pilot Projects
  • Skin Aging / drug effects*
  • Time Factors

Substances

  • Neuromuscular Agents
  • Botulinum Toxins, Type A