Retinal eccentricity effects on reaction time to imagined stimuli
- PMID: 16360710
- DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2005.11.012
Retinal eccentricity effects on reaction time to imagined stimuli
Abstract
To cast light on the possible neural substrate of visual imagery we tested normal participants and one hemianopic patient on simple reaction time (RT) to real and imagined visual stimuli. In one experiment participants were to detect as quickly as possible a luminous square presented at one out of two different retinal eccentricities. A well known effect with visual stimuli is that RT is slower for peripheral versus central stimuli. We found that imagined stimuli showed an eccentricity effect similar to that obtained with real stimuli. However, this was not the case in a patient with a hemianopic visual field loss (quadrantanopia) as a result of damage to the optic radiation. Even though the patient showed no difficulty in imaging stimuli in the affected hemifield she did not show an eccentricity effect as was the case in her intact side. In a second experiment, normal participants showed faster RT to stimuli of larger size with either real or imagined stimuli. Overall, these results show that visual perception and imagination share a similar visuotopic organisation that is disrupted following deafferentation of the visual cortex.
Similar articles
-
The cortical representation of foveal stimuli: evidence from quadrantanopia and TMS-induced suppression.Brain Res Cogn Brain Res. 2004 Nov;21(3):309-16. doi: 10.1016/j.cogbrainres.2004.06.006. Brain Res Cogn Brain Res. 2004. PMID: 15511647
-
Interhemispheric transfer and integration of imagined visual stimuli.Neuropsychologia. 2008 Feb 12;46(3):803-9. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2007.07.026. Epub 2007 Sep 1. Neuropsychologia. 2008. PMID: 17920086
-
The influence of "blind" distractors on eye movement trajectories in visual hemifield defects.J Cogn Neurosci. 2008 Nov;20(11):2025-36. doi: 10.1162/jocn.2008.20145. J Cogn Neurosci. 2008. PMID: 18416675
-
Role of the input in visual hemispheric asymmetries.Psychol Bull. 1983 May;93(3):481-512. Psychol Bull. 1983. PMID: 6408660 Review. No abstract available.
-
[The "filling-in-trap". Our sences deceive us].Lakartidningen. 2000 Dec 20;97(51-52):6041-3. Lakartidningen. 2000. PMID: 11195442 Review. Swedish.
Cited by
-
Is simple reaction time affected by visual illusions?Exp Brain Res. 2010 Mar;201(2):345-50. doi: 10.1007/s00221-009-2023-y. Epub 2009 Sep 26. Exp Brain Res. 2010. PMID: 19784639
-
Interhemispheric transfer of phosphenes generated by occipital versus parietal transcranial magnetic stimulation.Exp Brain Res. 2009 Jan;192(3):431-41. doi: 10.1007/s00221-008-1496-4. Epub 2008 Jul 29. Exp Brain Res. 2009. PMID: 18663438
-
The effects of incidentally learned temporal and spatial predictability on response times and visual fixations during target detection and discrimination.PLoS One. 2014 Apr 14;9(4):e94539. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0094539. eCollection 2014. PLoS One. 2014. PMID: 24732965 Free PMC article.
-
Unconscious Imagination and the Mental Imagery Debate.Front Psychol. 2017 May 23;8:799. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00799. eCollection 2017. Front Psychol. 2017. PMID: 28588527 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Reaction times and perceptual adjustments are sensitive to the illusory distortion of space.Exp Brain Res. 2012 Apr;218(1):119-28. doi: 10.1007/s00221-012-3012-0. Epub 2012 Feb 5. Exp Brain Res. 2012. PMID: 22311468
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous
