Comparison of beta-blockers, amiodarone plus beta-blockers, or sotalol for prevention of shocks from implantable cardioverter defibrillators: the OPTIC Study: a randomized trial
- PMID: 16403928
- DOI: 10.1001/jama.295.2.165
Comparison of beta-blockers, amiodarone plus beta-blockers, or sotalol for prevention of shocks from implantable cardioverter defibrillators: the OPTIC Study: a randomized trial
Abstract
Context: Implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) therapy is effective but is associated with high-voltage shocks that are painful.
Objective: To determine whether amiodarone plus beta-blocker or sotalol are better than beta-blocker alone for prevention of ICD shocks.
Design, setting, and patients: A randomized controlled trial with blinded adjudication of events of 412 patients from 39 outpatient ICD clinical centers located in Canada, Germany, United States, England, Sweden, and Austria, conducted from January 13, 2001, to September 28, 2004. Patients were eligible if they had received an ICD within 21 days for inducible or spontaneously occurring ventricular tachycardia or fibrillation.
Intervention: Patients were randomized to treatment for 1 year with amiodarone plus beta-blocker, sotalol alone, or beta-blocker alone.
Main outcome measure: Primary outcome was ICD shock for any reason.
Results: Shocks occurred in 41 patients (38.5%) assigned to beta-blocker alone, 26 (24.3%) assigned to sotalol, and 12 (10.3%) assigned to amiodarone plus beta-blocker. A reduction in the risk of shock was observed with use of either amiodarone plus beta-blocker or sotalol vs beta-blocker alone (hazard ratio [HR], 0.44; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.28-0.68; P<.001). Amiodarone plus beta-blocker significantly reduced the risk of shock compared with beta-blocker alone (HR, 0.27; 95% CI, 0.14-0.52; P<.001) and sotalol (HR, 0.43; 95% CI, 0.22-0.85; P = .02). There was a trend for sotalol to reduce shocks compared with beta-blocker alone (HR, 0.61; 95% CI, 0.37-1.01; P = .055). The rates of study drug discontinuation at 1 year were 18.2% for amiodarone, 23.5% for sotalol, and 5.3% for beta-blocker alone. Adverse pulmonary and thyroid events and symptomatic bradycardia were more common among patients randomized to amiodarone.
Conclusions: Despite use of advanced ICD technology and treatment with a beta-blocker, shocks occur commonly in the first year after ICD implant. Amiodarone plus beta-blocker is effective for preventing these shocks and is more effective than sotalol but has an increased risk of drug-related adverse effects.Clinical Trials Registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00257959.
Comment in
-
Antiarrhythmic drugs for all patients with an ICD?JAMA. 2006 Jan 11;295(2):211-3. doi: 10.1001/jama.295.2.211. JAMA. 2006. PMID: 16403933 No abstract available.
-
Antiarrhythmic therapy for prevention of implantable cardioverter defibrillator shocks.JAMA. 2006 Sep 13;296(10):1229-30; author reply 1230. doi: 10.1001/jama.296.10.1229-b. JAMA. 2006. PMID: 16968840 No abstract available.
-
Antiarrhythmic therapy for prevention of implantable cardioverter defibrillator shocks.JAMA. 2006 Sep 13;296(10):1229; author reply 1230. doi: 10.1001/jama.296.10.1229-a. JAMA. 2006. PMID: 16968841 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Prevalence of appropriate cardioverter-defibrillator shocks in 1038 consecutive patients with implantable cardioverter-defibrillators.Am J Ther. 2009 Jul-Aug;16(4):323-5. doi: 10.1097/MJT.0b013e3181727a59. Am J Ther. 2009. PMID: 19617719
-
Effect of amiodarone and sotalol on ventricular defibrillation threshold: the optimal pharmacological therapy in cardioverter defibrillator patients (OPTIC) trial.Circulation. 2006 Jul 11;114(2):104-9. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.106.618421. Epub 2006 Jul 3. Circulation. 2006. PMID: 16818810 Clinical Trial.
-
Effects of antiarrhythmic drugs on inappropriate shocks in patients with implantable cardioverter defibrillators.Circ J. 2008 Jan;72(1):102-5. doi: 10.1253/circj.72.102. Circ J. 2008. PMID: 18159108 Clinical Trial.
-
Antiarrhythmic drugs in patients with implantable cardioverter-defibrillators.Am J Cardiovasc Drugs. 2005;5(6):371-8. doi: 10.2165/00129784-200505060-00004. Am J Cardiovasc Drugs. 2005. PMID: 16259525 Review.
-
Ventricular Tachycardia with ICD Shocks: When to Medicate and When to Ablate.Curr Cardiol Rep. 2017 Sep 13;19(11):105. doi: 10.1007/s11886-017-0924-0. Curr Cardiol Rep. 2017. PMID: 28900864 Review.
Cited by
-
Stereotactic arrhythmia radioablation (STAR) opens a new era in the treatment of arrhythmias?Front Cardiovasc Med. 2024 Sep 27;11:1449028. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2024.1449028. eCollection 2024. Front Cardiovasc Med. 2024. PMID: 39399514 Free PMC article. Review.
-
A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Catheter Ablation Versus Anti-arrhythmic Drugs for Treatment of Ventricular Arrhythmia.Cureus. 2024 Aug 24;16(8):e67649. doi: 10.7759/cureus.67649. eCollection 2024 Aug. Cureus. 2024. PMID: 39314557 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Quantifying dose uncertainties resulting from cardiorespiratory motion in intensity-modulated proton therapy for cardiac stereotactic body radiotherapy.Front Oncol. 2024 Jul 8;14:1399589. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1399589. eCollection 2024. Front Oncol. 2024. PMID: 39040445 Free PMC article.
-
Catheter ablation versus antiarrhythmic drug therapy for sustained ventricular tachycardia in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2024 May 16;24(1):255. doi: 10.1186/s12872-024-03924-w. BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2024. PMID: 38755595 Free PMC article.
-
Non-Pharmacological Treatment of Heart Failure-From Physical Activity to Electrical Therapies: A Literature Review.J Cardiovasc Dev Dis. 2024 Apr 17;11(4):122. doi: 10.3390/jcdd11040122. J Cardiovasc Dev Dis. 2024. PMID: 38667740 Free PMC article. Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Associated data
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
