Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2006 Jan;79(1):144-52.
doi: 10.1016/j.clpt.2005.09.012.

Acid-suppressive effects of rabeprazole, omeprazole, and lansoprazole at reduced and standard doses: a crossover comparative study in homozygous extensive metabolizers of cytochrome P450 2C19

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Acid-suppressive effects of rabeprazole, omeprazole, and lansoprazole at reduced and standard doses: a crossover comparative study in homozygous extensive metabolizers of cytochrome P450 2C19

Tomohiko Shimatani et al. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2006 Jan.

Abstract

Background and objectives: To improve clinical outcomes of the initial therapy for gastroesophageal reflux disease, intragastric pH should be above 4.0 for more than 20 hours a day (83.3%) and nocturnal gastric acid breakthrough, defined as 60 continuous minutes of intragastric pH below 4.0 at night, should be inhibited. A "step-down" therapy sometimes fails because of insufficient acid suppression. Therefore we compared the acid-suppressive effects of proton pump inhibitors.

Methods: This was a prospective, randomized, open-label, 8-way crossover study. In 9 healthy Helicobacter pylori-negative cytochrome P450 (CYP) 2C19 homozygous extensive metabolizers, intragastric pH was measured for 24 hours on day 7 of treatment with rabeprazole, omeprazole, and lansoprazole orally administered once daily at reduced and standard doses.

Results: Compared with baseline data (7% [range, 5%-20%]), the median values of the 24-hour percent of time that intragastric pH was above 4.0 significantly increased but did not exceed 83.3% under any of the 7 regimens, which were as follows: 10 mg rabeprazole (51% [range, 28%-78%], P < .01), 20 mg rabeprazole (59% [range, 36%-83%], P < .01), 10 mg omeprazole (26% [range, 4%-33%], P < .05), 20 mg omeprazole (48% [range, 31%-73%], P < .01), 40 mg omeprazole (62% [range, 47%-87%], P < .01), 15 mg lansoprazole (34% [range, 5%-51%], P < .05), and 30 mg lansoprazole (56% [range, 20%-76%], P < .05). Significant differences were observed among 10, 20, and 40 mg omeprazole (10 mg versus 20 mg, P < .01; 10 mg versus 40 mg, P < .01; and 20 mg versus 40 mg, P < .05) and between 15 and 30 mg lansoprazole (P < .01), whereas no significant difference was observed between 10 and 20 mg rabeprazole. Nocturnal gastric acid breakthrough was observed under all regimens.

Conclusions: Rabeprazole, omeprazole, and lansoprazole, given once daily at standard doses, cannot be expected to achieve ideal acid suppression for the initial therapy for gastroesophageal reflux disease in Helicobacter-negative CYP2C19 homozygous extensive metabolizers. Rabeprazole 10 mg may be appropriate for step-down therapy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources