Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2006 Jan-Feb;4(1):40-5.
doi: 10.1370/afm.422.

Encounters by patients with type 2 diabetes--complex and demanding: an observational study

Affiliations

Encounters by patients with type 2 diabetes--complex and demanding: an observational study

Michael L Parchman et al. Ann Fam Med. 2006 Jan-Feb.

Abstract

Purpose: We wanted to examine the relationships between quality of diabetes care delivered, the type and length of encounter, and time to the next follow-up encounter.

Methods: The content of the physician-patient encounter was directly observed in 20 primary care clinics for 211 patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. The quality of diabetes care was measured as the percentage of the 5 following services delivered during the encounter if they had not been offered in the previous year: foot examination, referral for an eye examination, a glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) measurement, a lipid panel, and a urine microalbumin test.

Results: All indicated services were performed in 33% of encounters. Compared with encounters for an acute illness, patients visiting for chronic disease follow-up were 4.8 (95% CI, 1.95%-12.01%) times more likely to receive 100% of all indicated services. Length of encounter was associated with percentage of services delivered, but only during chronic disease follow-up encounters (P = .02). Encounters during which 100% of all indicated services were delivered had a mean length of 19.4 minutes. The time to the next scheduled encounter was shorter if fewer services were delivered during the observed encounter (P = .009).

Conclusions: Competing demands during primary care encounters require patient and physician to prioritize services delivered and defer indicated services to subsequent visits. Current models of patient care in primary care settings are inadequate to address the multitude of tasks facing clinicians, especially among patients with complex chronic illnesses. Innovative approaches and new models are needed to improve the quality of diabetes care.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Time to next appointment and indicated services delivered.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Janes G. Ambulatory medical care for diabetics. In: Harris MI, Cowie CC, Stern MP, Boyko EJ, Reiber GE, Bennett PH, Eds. Diabetes in America. 2nd ed. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office; 1995:541–552. NIH Publication No 595-1468.
    1. Institute of Medicine. Division of Health Services. Committee on the Future of Primary Care. Primary Care: America’s Health in a New Era. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 1996.
    1. Weiner JP, Parente ST, Garnick DW, et al. Variation in office-based quality. A claims-based profile of care provided to Medicare patients with diabetes. JAMA. 1995;273:1503–1508. - PubMed
    1. Rundall TG, Shortell SM, Wang MC, et al. As good as it gets? Chronic care management in nine leading US physician organisations. BMJ. 2002;325:958–961. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kerr EA, Gerzoff RB, Krein SL, et al. Diabetes care quality in the Veterans Affairs Health Care System and commercial managed care: the TRIAD study. Ann Intern Med. 2004;141:272–281. - PubMed

Publication types

Substances