Entecavir versus lamivudine for patients with HBeAg-negative chronic hepatitis B
- PMID: 16525138
- DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa051287
Entecavir versus lamivudine for patients with HBeAg-negative chronic hepatitis B
Erratum in
- N Engl J Med. 2006 Apr 27;354(17):1863
Abstract
Background: Entecavir is a potent and selective antiviral agent that has demonstrated efficacy in phase 2 studies in patients with hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg)-negative chronic hepatitis B.
Methods: In this phase 3, double-blind trial, we randomly assigned 648 patients with HBeAg-negative chronic hepatitis B who had not previously been treated with a nucleoside analogue to receive 0.5 mg of entecavir or 100 mg of lamivudine once daily for a minimum of 52 weeks. The primary efficacy end point was histologic improvement (a decrease by at least two points in the Knodell necroinflammatory score, without worsening of fibrosis).
Results: Histologic improvement after 48 weeks of treatment occurred in 208 of 296 patients in the entecavir group who had adequate baseline liver-biopsy specimens that could be evaluated (70 percent), as compared with 174 of 287 such patients in the lamivudine group (61 percent, P=0.01). More patients in the entecavir group than in the lamivudine group had undetectable serum hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA levels according to a polymerase-chain-reaction assay (90 percent vs. 72 percent, P<0.001) and normalization of alanine aminotransferase levels (78 percent vs. 71 percent, P=0.045). The mean reduction in serum HBV DNA levels from baseline to week 48 was greater with entecavir than with lamivudine (5.0 vs. 4.5 log [on a base-10 scale] copies per milliliter, P<0.001). There was no evidence of resistance to entecavir. Safety and adverse-event profiles were similar in the two groups.
Conclusions: Among patients with HBeAg-negative chronic hepatitis B who had not previously been treated with a nucleoside analogue, the rates of histologic improvement, virologic response, and normalization of alanine aminotransferase levels were significantly higher at 48 weeks with entecavir than with lamivudine. The safety profile of the two agents was similar, and there was no evidence of viral resistance to entecavir. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00035789.).
Copyright 2006 Massachusetts Medical Society.
Comment in
-
Hepatitis B--preventable and now treatable.N Engl J Med. 2006 Mar 9;354(10):1074-6. doi: 10.1056/NEJMe058309. N Engl J Med. 2006. PMID: 16525145 No abstract available.
-
Liver disease: hepatitis B. Treatment of chronic hepatitis B With entecavir.Rev Gastroenterol Disord. 2006 Spring;6(2):112-6. Rev Gastroenterol Disord. 2006. PMID: 16699474 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
A comparison of entecavir and lamivudine for HBeAg-positive chronic hepatitis B.N Engl J Med. 2006 Mar 9;354(10):1001-10. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa051285. N Engl J Med. 2006. PMID: 16525137 Clinical Trial.
-
Entecavir therapy for up to 96 weeks in patients with HBeAg-positive chronic hepatitis B.Gastroenterology. 2007 Nov;133(5):1437-44. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2007.08.025. Epub 2007 Aug 14. Gastroenterology. 2007. PMID: 17983800 Clinical Trial.
-
Efficacy and safety of entecavir in lamivudine-refractory patients with chronic hepatitis B: randomized controlled trial in Japanese patients.J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2008 Sep;23(9):1320-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1746.2008.05455.x. Epub 2008 Jun 28. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2008. PMID: 18554238 Clinical Trial.
-
Entecavir for the treatment of chronic hepatitis B virus infection.Clin Ther. 2006 Feb;28(2):184-203. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2006.02.012. Clin Ther. 2006. PMID: 16678641 Review.
-
Treatment of chronic hepatitis B: Evolution over two decades.J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2011 Jan;26 Suppl 1:138-43. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1746.2010.06545.x. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2011. PMID: 21199525 Review.
Cited by
-
Tackling hepatitis B Virus with CRISPR/Cas9: advances, challenges, and delivery strategies.Virus Genes. 2024 Dec;60(6):592-602. doi: 10.1007/s11262-024-02105-3. Epub 2024 Aug 28. Virus Genes. 2024. PMID: 39196289 Review.
-
Antiviral Therapy of Chronic Hepatitis B Virus between Present and Future.J Clin Med. 2024 Apr 2;13(7):2055. doi: 10.3390/jcm13072055. J Clin Med. 2024. PMID: 38610820 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Cost-effectiveness of switching from tenofovir disoproxil fumarate to tenofovir alafenamide versus entecavir for chronic hepatitis B patients in Greece.J Comp Eff Res. 2024 Apr;13(4):e230090. doi: 10.57264/cer-2023-0090. Epub 2024 Feb 6. J Comp Eff Res. 2024. PMID: 38317634 Free PMC article.
-
Steady Decline of HBV DNA Load under NAs in Lymphoma Patients and a Higher Level of qAnti-HBc Predict HBV Reactivation.J Clin Med. 2023 Dec 19;13(1):23. doi: 10.3390/jcm13010023. J Clin Med. 2023. PMID: 38202030 Free PMC article.
-
Efficacy and safety of tenofovir alafenamide in patients with chronic hepatitis B exhibiting suboptimal response to entecavir.World J Clin Cases. 2023 Dec 6;11(34):8139-8146. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v11.i34.8139. World J Clin Cases. 2023. PMID: 38130795 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Associated data
- Actions
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources