Effect of non-invasive positive pressure ventilation (NIPPV) on mortality in patients with acute cardiogenic pulmonary oedema: a meta-analysis
- PMID: 16616558
- DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(06)68506-1
Effect of non-invasive positive pressure ventilation (NIPPV) on mortality in patients with acute cardiogenic pulmonary oedema: a meta-analysis
Abstract
Background: Non-invasive positive pressure ventilation (NIPPV), using continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) or bilevel ventilation, has been shown to reduce the need for invasive mechanical ventilation in patients with acute cardiogenic pulmonary oedema. We assessed additional benefits of NIPPV in a meta-analysis.
Methods: Meta-analysis comparison in acute cardiogenic pulmonary oedema was undertaken to compare (1) CPAP with standard therapy (oxygen by face-mask, diuretics, nitrates, and other supportive care), (2) bilevel ventilation with standard therapy, and (3) bilevel ventilation with CPAP, incorporating randomised controlled trials identified by electronic and hand search (1966-May, 2005). In 23 trials that fulfilled inclusion criteria, we assessed the effect of NIPPV on hospital mortality and mechanical ventilation, estimated as relative risks.
Findings: CPAP was associated with a significantly lower mortality rate than standard therapy (relative risk 0.59, 95% CI 0.38-0.90, p=0.015). A non-significant trend towards reduced mortality was seen in the comparison between bilevel ventilation and standard therapy (0.63, 0.37-1.10, p=0.11). We recorded no substantial difference in mortality risk between bilevel ventilation and CPAP (p=0.38). The need for mechanical ventilation was reduced with CPAP (0.44, 0.29-0.66, p=0.0003) and with bilevel ventilation (0.50, 0.27-0.90, p=0.02), compared with standard therapy; but no significant difference was seen between CPAP and bilevel ventilation (p=0.86). Weak evidence of an increase in the incidence of new myocardial infarction with bilevel ventilation versus CPAP was recorded (1.49, 0.92-2.42, p=0.11). Heterogeneity of treatment effects was not evident for mortality or mechanical ventilation across patients' groups.
Interpretation: In patients with acute cardiogenic pulmonary oedema, CPAP and bilevel ventilation reduces the need for subsequent mechanical ventilation. Compared with standard therapy, CPAP reduces mortality; our results also suggest a trend towards reduced mortality after bilevel NIPPV.
Similar articles
-
A multicentre randomised controlled trial of the use of continuous positive airway pressure and non-invasive positive pressure ventilation in the early treatment of patients presenting to the emergency department with severe acute cardiogenic pulmonary oedema: the 3CPO trial.Health Technol Assess. 2009 Jul;13(33):1-106. doi: 10.3310/hta13330. Health Technol Assess. 2009. PMID: 19615296 Clinical Trial.
-
A comparison of continuous and bi-level positive airway pressure non-invasive ventilation in patients with acute cardiogenic pulmonary oedema: a meta-analysis.Crit Care. 2006;10(2):R49. doi: 10.1186/cc4861. Crit Care. 2006. PMID: 16569254 Free PMC article.
-
Continuous positive airway pressure versus bilevel noninvasive ventilation in acute cardiogenic pulmonary edema: a randomized multicenter trial.Ann Emerg Med. 2007 Dec;50(6):666-75, 675.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2007.06.488. Epub 2007 Aug 30. Ann Emerg Med. 2007. PMID: 17764785 Clinical Trial.
-
Non-invasive positive pressure ventilation (CPAP or bilevel NPPV) for cardiogenic pulmonary oedema.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 May 31;(5):CD005351. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005351.pub3. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013. Update in: Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Apr 05;4:CD005351. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005351.pub4 PMID: 23728654 Updated. Review.
-
Non-invasive ventilation in acute cardiogenic pulmonary oedema.Postgrad Med J. 2005 Oct;81(960):637-43. doi: 10.1136/pgmj.2004.031229. Postgrad Med J. 2005. PMID: 16210459 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Clinical review of non-invasive ventilation.Eur Respir J. 2024 Nov 7;64(5):2400396. doi: 10.1183/13993003.00396-2024. Print 2024 Nov. Eur Respir J. 2024. PMID: 39227076 Free PMC article. Review.
-
A randomized controlled trial of the intraoperative use of noninvasive ventilation versus supplemental oxygen by face mask for procedural sedation in an electrophysiology laboratory.Can J Anaesth. 2023 Jul;70(7):1182-1193. doi: 10.1007/s12630-023-02495-2. Epub 2023 Jun 2. Can J Anaesth. 2023. PMID: 37268802 Clinical Trial. English.
-
Acute dyspnea in the emergency department: a clinical review.Intern Emerg Med. 2023 Aug;18(5):1491-1507. doi: 10.1007/s11739-023-03322-8. Epub 2023 Jun 2. Intern Emerg Med. 2023. PMID: 37266791 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Dexmedetomidine as Conduit for Non-Invasive Ventilation (NIV) Compliance in COVID-19 and Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Patients in Intensive Care Unit (ICU) Setting: Case Series.Cureus. 2023 Jan 19;15(1):e33981. doi: 10.7759/cureus.33981. eCollection 2023 Jan. Cureus. 2023. PMID: 36811041 Free PMC article.
-
Factors Related to Hospitalisation-Associated Disability in Patients after Surgery for Acute Type A Aortic Dissection: A Retrospective Study.Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Oct 9;19(19):12918. doi: 10.3390/ijerph191912918. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022. PMID: 36232218 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
