Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2006 May 2;103(18):7006-11.
doi: 10.1073/pnas.0602024103. Epub 2006 Apr 25.

A multistep adhesion cascade for lymphoid progenitor cell homing to the thymus

Affiliations

A multistep adhesion cascade for lymphoid progenitor cell homing to the thymus

M Lucila Scimone et al. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. .

Abstract

Homing of bone marrow (BM)-derived progenitors to the thymus is essential for T cell development. We have previously reported that two subpopulations of common lymphoid progenitors, CLP-1 and CLP-2, coexist in the BM and give rise to lymphocytes. We demonstrate that CLP-2 migrate to the thymus more efficiently than any other BM-derived progenitors. Short-term adoptive transfer experiments revealed that CLP-2 homing involves P-selectin/P-selectin glycoprotein ligand 1 interactions, pertussis toxin-sensitive chemoattractant signaling by CC chemokine ligand 25 through CC chemokine receptor 9, and binding of the integrins alpha4beta1 and alphaLbeta2 to their respective ligands, vascular cell adhesion molecule 1 and intercellular adhesion molecule 1. Preferential thymus-tropism of CLP-2 correlated with higher chemokine receptor 9 expression than on other BM progenitors. Thus, CLP access to the thymus is controlled by a tissue-specific and subset-selective multistep adhesion cascade.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of interest statement: No conflicts declared.

Figures

Fig. 1.
Fig. 1.
CLP-2 are enriched in the thymus after adoptive transfer of lin BM cells. lin BM cells from pTα-hCD25 mice were adoptively transferred into Rag2−/−γc−/− mice. After 20 h, thymi (A) and BM (B) were harvested, and single-cell suspensions were stained for B220 and c-kit. Data are shown as the percentage of cells in the input population versus the percentage of those populations in the target organ.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 2.
P-selectin and PSGL-1 mediate lymphoid progenitor homing to the thymus. lin BM cells from pTα-hCD25 mice were pretreated with anti-L-selectin or control mAbs and adoptively transferred into Rag2−/−γc−/− mice. Anti-P-selectin, anti-E-selectin, or control mAbs were injected into recipient mice 15 min before transferring lin BM cells. After 20 h, thymi (A) and BM (B) were harvested, and single-cell suspensions were stained for Ly5.1 and hCD25 (n = 6 mice). (C) CFSE-labeled lin BM cells from PSGL-1−/− mice together with TRITC-labeled lin BM cells from WT controls were mixed in a 1:1 ratio and injected i.v. into Rag2−/−γc−/− cells. After 20 h, spleen, thymi, and BM were harvested, and single-cell suspensions were analyzed for the presence of TRITC+ and CFSE+ lin BM cells (n = 5 mice).
Fig. 3.
Fig. 3.
Chemokine receptor expression and chemotaxis of lymphoid progenitors. (A) From left to right: BM pro-B cells, CLP-2, CLP-1, and early thymic immigrants (double-negative 1 c-kit+hCD25+) were sorted and analyzed by semiquantitative RT-PCR for the expression of multiple CCRs. cDNA quantities were normalized according to GADPH or actin expression over three subsequent 5× dilutions. (B and C) lin BM cells from pTα-hCD25 mice were added to inserts that were placed in wells containing medium alone or the following chemokines: CCL5, CCL2, CCL19, CCL21, CXCL12, or CCL25. Responding cells were harvested 2 h later, stained for hCD25, B220, and c-kit, and analyzed by flow cytometry. (B) Migration as percentage of the input. (C) Chemotactic index. (n = 3 experiments.)
Fig. 4.
Fig. 4.
CCR9/CCL25 is involved in lymphoid progenitor homing to the thymus. lin BM cells from pTα-hCD25 mice were i.v injected into Rag2−/−γc−/− mice pretreated with anti-CXCL12, anti-CCL21, anti-CCL25, or control mAbs. After 20 h, thymi (A) and BM (B) were harvested, and single-cell suspensions were stained for Ly5.1 and hCD25 (n = 8 mice). (C) CFSE-labeled lin BM cells from CCR9−/− mice together with TRITC-labeled lin BM cells from WT controls were mixed in a 1:1 ratio and injected i.v. into Rag2−/−γc−/− cells. After 20 h, spleen, thymi, and BM were harvested, and single-cell suspensions were analyzed by flow cytometry for the presence of TRITC+ and CFSE+ lin BM cells (n = 6 mice).
Fig. 5.
Fig. 5.
A nonredundant role of α4β1 and αLβ2 in lymphoid progenitor homing to the thymus. lin BM cells from pTα-hCD25 mice were pretreated with anti-α4, anti-β2, both, or control mAbs and adoptively transferred into Rag2−/−γc−/− mice treated or not with anti-VCAM-1 or anti-ICAM-1 mAbs. Twenty hours later, thymi (A) and BM (B) were harvested, and cell suspensions were stained for Ly5.1 and hCD25 (n = 4 mice).
Fig. 6.
Fig. 6.
Homing to the thymus is mediated by a unique cascade of adhesion and signaling events. Cells expressing PSGL-1 or other P-selectin ligands and probably also α4β1 can initiate the adhesion cascade to home to the thymus. Subsequently, a Gαi-coupled activating stimulus is required to activate the integrins α4β1 and αLβ2, which allow the firm adhesion of the progenitors through interactions with VCAM-1 and ICAM-1, respectively. This activation depends on signaling through the CCL25/CCR9 pair. A still-unknown Gαi-independent mechanism is partially involved in the homing of lymphoid progenitors to the thymus. The unique combination of these events efficiently results in the selective recruitment of lymphoid progenitors.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Shortman K., Wu L. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 1996;14:29–47. - PubMed
    1. Igarashi H., Gregory S. C., Yokota T., Sakaguchi N., Kincade P. W. Immunity. 2002;17:117–130. - PubMed
    1. Kondo M., Weissman I. L., Akashi K. Cell. 1997;91:661–672. - PubMed
    1. Wu L., Scollay R., Egerton M., Pearse M., Spangrude G. J., Shortman K. Nature. 1991;349:71–74. - PubMed
    1. Wu L., Antica M., Johnson G. R., Scollay R., Shortman K. J. Exp. Med. 1991;174:1617–1627. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms