Non-invasive imaging compared with intra-arterial angiography in the diagnosis of symptomatic carotid stenosis: a meta-analysis
- PMID: 16679163
- DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(06)68650-9
Non-invasive imaging compared with intra-arterial angiography in the diagnosis of symptomatic carotid stenosis: a meta-analysis
Abstract
Background: Accurate carotid imaging is important for effective secondary stroke prevention. Non-invasive imaging, now widely available, is replacing intra-arterial angiography for carotid stenosis, but the accuracy remains uncertain despite an extensive literature. We systematically reviewed the accuracy of non-invasive imaging compared with intra-arterial angiography for diagnosing carotid stenosis in patients with carotid territory ischaemic symptoms.
Methods: We searched for articles published between 1980 and April 2004; included studies comparing non-invasive imaging with intra-arterial angiography that met Standards for Reporting of Diagnostic Accuracy (STARD) criteria; extracted data to calculate sensitivity and specificity of non-invasive imaging, to test for heterogeneity and to perform sensitivity analyses; and categorised percent stenosis by the North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial (NASCET) method.
Results: In 41 included studies (2541 patients, 4876 arteries), contrast-enhanced MR angiography was more sensitive (0.94, 95% CI 0.88-0.97) and specific (0.93, 95% CI 0.89-0.96) for 70-99% stenosis than Doppler ultrasound, MR angiography, and CT angiography (sensitivities 0.89, 0.88, 0.76; specificities 0.84, 0.84, 0.94, respectively). Data for 50-69% stenoses and combinations of non-invasive tests were sparse and unreliable. There was heterogeneity between studies and evidence of publication bias.
Interpretation: Non-invasive tests, used cautiously, could replace intra-arterial carotid angiography for 70-99% stenosis. However, more data are required to determine their accuracy, especially at 50-69% stenoses where the balance of risk and benefit for carotid endarterectomy is particularly narrow, and to explore and overcome heterogeneity. Methodology for evaluating imaging tests should be improved; blinded, prospective studies in clinically relevant patients are essential basic characteristics.
Comment in
-
Review: noninvasive imaging techniques may be useful for diagnosing 70% to 99% carotid stenosis in symptomatic patients.ACP J Club. 2006 Nov-Dec;145(3):77. ACP J Club. 2006. PMID: 17080989 No abstract available.
-
[Non-invasive quantification of carotid stenosis: CT-, MR angiography or ultrasound?].Radiologe. 2007 Nov;47(11):960-1. doi: 10.1007/s00117-007-1578-5. Radiologe. 2007. PMID: 17968526 German. No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Accurate, practical and cost-effective assessment of carotid stenosis in the UK.Health Technol Assess. 2006 Aug;10(30):iii-iv, ix-x, 1-182. doi: 10.3310/hta10300. Health Technol Assess. 2006. PMID: 16904049 Review.
-
[Quantitative assessment of carotid stenosis: comparison between Doppler ultrasound, spiral computed tomography angiography, magnetic resonance angiography and digital angiography].J Mal Vasc. 2000 Dec;25(5):325-331. J Mal Vasc. 2000. PMID: 11148393 French.
-
Efficacy of patient selection strategies for carotid endarterectomy by contrast-enhanced MRA on a 1 T machine and duplex ultrasound in a regional hospital.Clin Radiol. 2008 Feb;63(2):174-83. doi: 10.1016/j.crad.2007.08.001. Epub 2007 Oct 26. Clin Radiol. 2008. PMID: 18194694
-
Magnetic resonance angiography is an accurate imaging adjunct to duplex ultrasound scan in patient selection for carotid endarterectomy.J Vasc Surg. 2000 Sep;32(3):429-38; discussion 439-40. doi: 10.1067/mva.2000.109330. J Vasc Surg. 2000. PMID: 10957649
-
Does carotid duplex imaging render angiography redundant before carotid endarterectomy?Br J Radiol. 1997 Mar;70:235-8. doi: 10.1259/bjr.70.831.9166045. Br J Radiol. 1997. PMID: 9166045 Review.
Cited by
-
Non-contrast-enhanced MR-angiography of Extracranial Arteries in Acute Ischemic Stroke at 1.5 Tesla Using Relaxation-Enhanced Angiography Without Contrast and Triggering (REACT).Clin Neuroradiol. 2024 Sep 24. doi: 10.1007/s00062-024-01458-4. Online ahead of print. Clin Neuroradiol. 2024. PMID: 39316116
-
ABCD2-I Score Predicts Unplanned Emergency Department Revisits within 72 Hours Due to Recurrent Acute Ischemic Stroke.Diagnostics (Basel). 2024 May 28;14(11):1118. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics14111118. Diagnostics (Basel). 2024. PMID: 38893644 Free PMC article.
-
In vitro analysis of carotid lesions using a preliminary microwave sensor to detect vulnerable plaques: Correlation with histology, Duplex ultrasound examination, and computed tomography scanner: The Imaging and Microwave Phenotyping Assessment of Carotid stenosis Threat (IMPACT) study.JVS Vasc Sci. 2023 Dec 19;5:100182. doi: 10.1016/j.jvssci.2023.100182. eCollection 2024. JVS Vasc Sci. 2023. PMID: 38384784 Free PMC article.
-
Diagnostic separation of conventional ⩾50% carotid stenosis and near-occlusion with phase-contrast MRI.Eur Stroke J. 2024 Mar;9(1):135-143. doi: 10.1177/23969873231215634. Epub 2023 Nov 30. Eur Stroke J. 2024. PMID: 38032058 Free PMC article.
-
Recommendation Update for Vascular Ultrasound Evaluation of Carotid and Vertebral Artery Disease: DIC, CBR and SABCV - 2023.Arq Bras Cardiol. 2023 Nov 20;120(10):e20230695. doi: 10.36660/abc.20230695. Arq Bras Cardiol. 2023. PMID: 37991060 Free PMC article. English, Portuguese. No abstract available.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Miscellaneous
