[Conventional vs minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty. A prospective study of rehabilitation and complications]

Orthopade. 2006 Jul;35(7):761-4, 766-8. doi: 10.1007/s00132-006-0969-z.
[Article in German]

Abstract

Background: In a prospective, nonrandomized study the outcome in terms of rehabilitation and complications of total hip arthroplasty (THA) through a superior capsulotomy exposure (study group) was compared to THA performed through a direct lateral exposure (control group).

Patients and methods: The study group (106 THA) and the control group (107 THA) were controlled for complexity and had no significant differences in age, sex, diagnosis, or body mass index.

Results: The study group had improved recovery at 6 weeks after surgery which was statistically significant (p<0.001). In addition, the study group had a lower incidence of perioperative complications.

Conclusion: The current study demonstrates the potential that less-invasive surgical techniques with the philosophy of maximally preserving the abductors, posterior capsule, and short rotators may result in a safer operation with an accelerated recovery.

Publication types

  • Controlled Clinical Trial
  • English Abstract

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Aged, 80 and over
  • Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip / instrumentation
  • Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip / methods
  • Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip / rehabilitation*
  • Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip / statistics & numerical data*
  • Female
  • Germany / epidemiology
  • Hip Joint / surgery*
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures / instrumentation
  • Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures / methods
  • Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures / rehabilitation*
  • Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures / statistics & numerical data*
  • Postoperative Complications / epidemiology*
  • Prospective Studies
  • Risk Assessment / methods*
  • Treatment Outcome