Bioartificial liver: its pros and cons

Ther Apher Dial. 2006 Apr;10(2):168-74. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-9987.2006.00359.x.


Both the large variety of liver functions for maintaining body homeostasis and the proven effectivity of whole liver transplantation in the therapy of acute liver failure (ALF), are important reasons to presume that cell-free liver support systems will not be able to adequately support the failing liver. Accordingly, bioartificial liver (BAL) systems have shown their efficacy in experimental ALF models in small and large animals, and have shown to be suitable and safe in phase 1 studies in humans with ALF. However, the optimal BAL system is still under development. Important issues are the source of the cellular component and the configuration of the BAL system with regard to cell attachment, mass transfer characteristics and oxygenation at site. The deficiency of all BAL systems to excrete bile effectively is another important topic for improvement. The great challenge for the future is to develop a well-functioning and safe human hepatic cell line which can replace the widely used porcine (xenogeneic) hepatocytes. Theoretically, a combination of a cell-free liver support system and a BAL system might be optimal for the treatment of ALF patients in the near future.

Publication types

  • Review

MeSH terms

  • Animals
  • Bile Acids and Salts / blood
  • Cell Line
  • Equipment Design
  • Hepatocytes
  • Humans
  • Liver Failure, Acute / blood
  • Liver Failure, Acute / therapy*
  • Liver Transplantation
  • Liver, Artificial*


  • Bile Acids and Salts