Assessing the amount of heterogeneity in random-effects meta-analysis
- PMID: 16708778
- DOI: 10.1002/bimj.200510175
Assessing the amount of heterogeneity in random-effects meta-analysis
Abstract
In a random-effects meta-analysis, a new confidence interval for the heterogeneity parameter is proposed. With this interval, the amount of heterogeneity in a meta-analysis can be assessed so that it can be judged whether the pooling of the estimates is meaningful. Through suitable corrections of the lower bound, based on the treatment effect measure of interest, the resulting interval yields satisfactory results with respect to the predefined confidence coefficient. Lower and upper bound of the interval can be used for one-sided hypothesis testing on the amount of the underlying between-trial variability.
Similar articles
-
Efficient two-step multivariate random effects meta-analysis of individual participant data for longitudinal clinical trials using mixed effects models.BMC Med Res Methodol. 2019 Feb 14;19(1):33. doi: 10.1186/s12874-019-0676-1. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2019. PMID: 30764757 Free PMC article.
-
Trial sequential methods for meta-analysis.Res Synth Methods. 2014 Sep;5(3):212-20. doi: 10.1002/jrsm.1104. Epub 2013 Nov 28. Res Synth Methods. 2014. PMID: 26052847
-
A likelihood approach to meta-analysis with random effects.Stat Med. 1996 Mar 30;15(6):619-29. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0258(19960330)15:6<619::AID-SIM188>3.0.CO;2-A. Stat Med. 1996. PMID: 8731004
-
Heterogeneity and statistical significance in meta-analysis: an empirical study of 125 meta-analyses.Stat Med. 2000 Jul 15;19(13):1707-28. doi: 10.1002/1097-0258(20000715)19:13<1707::aid-sim491>3.0.co;2-p. Stat Med. 2000. PMID: 10861773 Review.
-
[The practice of systematic reviews. IV. Pooling results from separate studies].Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 1999 Apr 10;143(15):786-91. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 1999. PMID: 10347641 Review. Dutch.
Cited by
-
Periodontal outcomes of children and adolescents with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Eur Arch Paediatr Dent. 2022 Aug;23(4):537-546. doi: 10.1007/s40368-022-00732-8. Epub 2022 Jul 15. Eur Arch Paediatr Dent. 2022. PMID: 35838891
-
Prognostic Role of Soluble Programmed Death Ligand 1 in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Front Oncol. 2021 Dec 23;11:774131. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2021.774131. eCollection 2021. Front Oncol. 2021. PMID: 35004295 Free PMC article.
-
Prognostic Value of Tumor-Stroma Ratio in Rectal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.Front Oncol. 2021 May 26;11:685570. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2021.685570. eCollection 2021. Front Oncol. 2021. PMID: 34123856 Free PMC article.
-
Jackknife empirical likelihood confidence intervals for assessing heterogeneity in meta-analysis of rare binary event data.Contemp Clin Trials. 2021 Aug;107:106440. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2021.106440. Epub 2021 May 17. Contemp Clin Trials. 2021. PMID: 34015509 Free PMC article.
-
Statistical Methods for Quantifying Between-study Heterogeneity in Meta-analysis with Focus on Rare Binary Events.Stat Interface. 2020;13(4):449-464. doi: 10.4310/sii.2020.v13.n4.a3. Stat Interface. 2020. PMID: 33628357 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
