Skip to main page content
Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2006 Nov;15(11):1717-28.
doi: 10.1007/s00586-006-0128-6. Epub 2006 May 31.

Danish Version of the Oswestry Disability Index for Patients With Low Back Pain. Part 2: Sensitivity, Specificity and Clinically Significant Improvement in Two Low Back Pain Populations

Affiliations

Danish Version of the Oswestry Disability Index for Patients With Low Back Pain. Part 2: Sensitivity, Specificity and Clinically Significant Improvement in Two Low Back Pain Populations

Henrik Hein Lauridsen et al. Eur Spine J. .

Erratum in

  • Eur Spine J. 2007 Jan;16(1):135-6

Abstract

In studies evaluating the efficacy of clinical interventions, it is of paramount importance that the functional outcome measures are responsive to clinically relevant change. Knowledge thereof is in fact essential for the choice of instrument in clinical trials and for clinical decision-making. This article endeavours to investigate the sensitivity, specificity and clinically significant improvement (responsiveness) of the Danish version of the Oswestry disability index (ODI) in two back pain populations. Two hundred and thirty three patients with low back pain (LBP) and/or leg pain completed a questionnaire booklet at baseline and 8 weeks follow-up. Half of the patients were seen in the primary (PrS) and half in the secondary sectors (SeS) of the Danish Health Care System. The booklet contained the Danish version of the ODI, along with the Roland Morris Questionnaire, the LBP Rating Scale, the SF36 (physical function and bodily pain scales) and a global pain rating. At follow-up, a 7-point transition question (TQ) of patient perceived change and a numeric rating scale relating to the importance of the change were included. Responsiveness was operationalised using three strategies: change scores, standardised response means (SRM) and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analyses. All methods revealed acceptable responsiveness of the ODI in the two patient populations which was comparable to the external instruments. SRM of the ODI change scores at 2 months follow-up was 1.0 for PrS patients and 0.3 for SeS (raw and percentage). A minimum clinically important change (MCID) from baseline score was established at 9 points (71%) for PrS patients and 8 points (27%) for SeS patients using ROC analyses. This was dependable on the baseline entry score with the MCID increasing with 5 points for every 10 points increase in the baseline score. We conclude that the Danish version of the ODI has comparable responsiveness to other commonly used functional status measures and is appropriate for use in low back pain patients receiving conservative care in both the primary and secondary sector.

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by 11 articles

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1995 Feb 1;20(3):341-52 - PubMed
    1. J Chronic Dis. 1986;39(11):897-906 - PubMed
    1. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2000 Dec 15;25(24):3192-9 - PubMed
    1. Eur Spine J. 2004 Jul;13(4):301-13 - PubMed
    1. Qual Life Res. 1993 Jun;2(3):221-6 - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources

Feedback