Percutaneous coronary interventions: guidelines, short- and long-term results, and comparison with coronary artery bypass grafting

Cardiol Clin. 2006 May;24(2):255-63, vii. doi: 10.1016/j.ccl.2006.01.002.

Abstract

An ever-growing number of patients are being referred for coronary revascularization in an attempt to reduce morbidity or to reduce mortality. Multiple randomized trials comparing percutaneous and surgical coronary revascularization have been performed. The decision to proceed with percutaneous or surgical revascularization should be based ona thorough understanding of the short- and long-term risks and benefits of each procedure in conjunction with the individual patient's coronary arterial anatomy and clinical risk profile.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study
  • Review

MeSH terms

  • Angina Pectoris / etiology
  • Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary*
  • Coronary Artery Bypass*
  • Coronary Disease / complications
  • Coronary Disease / mortality
  • Coronary Disease / therapy*
  • Humans
  • Practice Guidelines as Topic
  • Time Factors
  • Treatment Outcome