In vivo behavior of calcium phosphate scaffolds with four different pore sizes
- PMID: 16790273
- DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2006.05.051
In vivo behavior of calcium phosphate scaffolds with four different pore sizes
Abstract
The goal of the present study was to assess the effect of macropore size on the in vivo behavior of ceramic scaffolds. For that purpose, beta-tricalcium phosphate (beta-TCP) cylinders with four different macropore sizes (150, 260, 510, and 1220 microm) were implanted into drill hole defects in cancellous bone of sheep and their resorption behavior was followed for 6, 12 and 24 weeks. The scaffolds were evaluated for biocompatibility, and new bone formation was observed macroscopically, histologically and histomorphometrically. Histomorphometrical measurements were performed for the whole defect area and for the area subdivided into three concentric rings (outer, medial, and inner ring). All implants were tolerated very well as evidenced by the low amount of inflammatory cells and the absence of macroscopic signs of inflammation. Resorption proceeded fast since less than 5% ceramic remained at 24-week implantation. Hardly any effect of macropore size was observed on the in vivo response. Samples with an intermediate macropore size (510 microm) were resorbed significantly faster than samples with smaller macropore sizes (150 and 260 microm). However, this fast resorption was associated with a lower bone content and a higher soft tissue content. At 12 and 24 weeks, the latter differences had disappeared. Bone was more abundant in the outer ring than in the rest of the blocks at 6 weeks, and in the outer and medial ring compared to the inner ring at 12 weeks.
Similar articles
-
Bone formation on the apatite-coated zirconia porous scaffolds within a rabbit calvarial defect.J Biomater Appl. 2008 May;22(6):485-504. doi: 10.1177/0885328207078075. Epub 2007 May 10. J Biomater Appl. 2008. PMID: 17494967
-
Simulation of the in vivo resorption rate of β-tricalcium phosphate bone graft substitutes implanted in a sheep model.Biomaterials. 2011 Sep;32(27):6362-73. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2011.05.030. Epub 2011 Jun 11. Biomaterials. 2011. PMID: 21658758
-
Bone regeneration of porous beta-tricalcium phosphate (Conduit TCP) and of biphasic calcium phosphate ceramic (Biosel) in trabecular defects in sheep.J Biomed Mater Res A. 2007 Sep 1;82(3):711-22. doi: 10.1002/jbm.a.30990. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2007. PMID: 17326225
-
Review paper: behavior of ceramic biomaterials derived from tricalcium phosphate in physiological condition.J Biomater Appl. 2008 Nov;23(3):197-212. doi: 10.1177/0885328208096798. J Biomater Appl. 2008. PMID: 18996965 Review.
-
[Tricalcium phosphate and gentamycin. In vitro and in vivo antibiotic diffusion, rehabilitation in bone site in sheep].Chirurgie. 1996;121(4):298-308. Chirurgie. 1996. PMID: 8945817 Review. French.
Cited by
-
Bisphosphonates do not affect healing of a critical-size defect in estrogen-deficient mice.Bone Rep. 2024 Jan 17;20:101739. doi: 10.1016/j.bonr.2024.101739. eCollection 2024 Mar. Bone Rep. 2024. PMID: 38304619 Free PMC article.
-
Three-Dimensional Printed Hydroxyapatite Bone Substitutes Designed by a Novel Periodic Minimal Surface Algorithm Are Highly Osteoconductive.3D Print Addit Manuf. 2023 Oct 1;10(5):905-916. doi: 10.1089/3dp.2022.0134. Epub 2023 Oct 10. 3D Print Addit Manuf. 2023. PMID: 37886403 Free PMC article.
-
Development of a Novel Marine-Derived Tricomposite Biomaterial for Bone Regeneration.Mar Drugs. 2023 Aug 28;21(9):473. doi: 10.3390/md21090473. Mar Drugs. 2023. PMID: 37755086 Free PMC article.
-
Osteoconductivity of bone substitutes with filament-based microarchitectures: Influence of directionality, filament dimension, and distance.Int J Bioprint. 2022 Oct 27;9(1):626. doi: 10.18063/ijb.v9i1.626. eCollection 2023. Int J Bioprint. 2022. PMID: 36844242 Free PMC article.
-
Comparison of degradation behavior and osseointegration of 3D powder-printed calcium magnesium phosphate cement scaffolds with alkaline or acid post-treatment.Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2022 Sep 28;10:998254. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2022.998254. eCollection 2022. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2022. PMID: 36246367 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
