Skip to main page content
Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
, 60 (1), 3-15

Adaptation, Teleology, and Selection by Consequences

Adaptation, Teleology, and Selection by Consequences

Jon D Ringen. J Exp Anal Behav.


This paper presents and defends the view that reinforcement and natural selection are selection processes, that selection processes are neither mechanistic nor teleological, and that mentalistic and vitalistic processes are teleological but not mechanistic. The differences between these types of processes are described and used in discussing the conceptual and methodological significance of "selection type theories" and B. F. Skinner's radical behaviorist view that "operant behavior is the field of intention, purpose, and expectation. It deals with that field precisely as the theory of evolution has dealt with another kind of purpose" (1986, p. 716). The antimentalism of radical behaviorism emerges as a post-Darwinian extension of Francis Bacon's (and Galileo's) influential view that "[the introduction of final causes] rather corrupts than advances the sciences" (Bacon, 1905, p. 302).

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by 3 PubMed Central articles


    1. Am Psychol. 1988 Mar;43(3):151-60 - PubMed
    1. Science. 1993 Jan 8;259(5092):188-94 - PubMed
    1. Science. 1981 Jul 31;213(4507):501-4 - PubMed
    1. J Exp Anal Behav. 1987 Jul;48(1):1-15 - PubMed
    1. J Exp Anal Behav. 1984 Mar;41(2):217-21 - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources