Administration of peripheral parenteral nutrition: a prospective study comparing rotation of venous access sites with ultrafine cannulas

Clin Nutr. 1996 Dec;15(6):311-5. doi: 10.1016/s0261-5614(96)80006-9.

Abstract

Peripheral veins have been used successfully for patients requiring short- to medium-term total parenteral nutrition. This study prospectively compares two methods of peripheral parenteral nutrition (PPN). Forty-six patients requiring parenteral nutrition (PN) were identified prospectively. Fifty courses of PPN were prescribed using a standardized PPN formula of 9.3 g nitrogen, 1400 kCal, 2500 ml (KABI II, Pharmacia). Patients were randomized to receive PPN via 23G, 15 cm flexane catheters (Nutriline) inserted into an antecubital vein which remained in-situ with a continuous infusion over 24 h, or to receive 12-h cyclical infusions through peripherally sited 18G catheters (Venflon) which were removed postinfusion and reinserted into the contralateral forearm on alternate days. Data collected included duration, complications and cost of materials for each prescribed course. A scoring system to determine patient anxiety and depression and a questionnaire regarding patients' perspectives were evaluated. Fifty courses were prescribed, 26 by rotation of veins (RV) and 24 by Nutriline (N). Mean duration of feeding was 7.9 and 8.6 days, respectively; cost of materials were comparable 6.48/day (RV) vs 5.17/day (N); 2 RV patients failed to complete their course (no access [P< 0.05], whilst 9 N patients failed to complete their course (4 severe phlebitis, 2 no venous access, 2 septicaemia, 1 dislodged). Five patients required CPN (RV, N 3) while 4 remaining patients were fed by an alternative PPN method. The overall incidence of anxiety was 20% and of depression 16%, with no significant difference between groups. The majority of patients (87%) found mobility restricted. Twelve-hourly infusions via alternate forearm veins were significantly more successful than continuous infusions via Nutriline, both in terms of completion of the prescribed course and less venous morbidity. This study confirms that rotation of forearm veins allows affordable and successful PN administration to the majority of patients, with low PN-related morbidity.