The concept of the mechanostat was not new in 1983, when Harold Frost coined the term to describe a mechanism by which bone responded to habitual exercise and changes in loading with structurally appropriate alterations in bone architecture. However, the word "mechanostat" has a meaning that is immediately apparent, and its adoption has led to a much wider appreciation of the process of functional adaptation by other scientists than those whose primary research focus is in the biology of adaptation. One problem exists though: it is widely thought that in a single individual, there is a setting for the mechanostat, just as a single thermostat might set the temperature for a whole house, and this is reflected in the idea that bones throughout the skeleton require a specific strain magnitude for maintenance. Increases in loading above that threshold are expected to induce bone formation and a stiffer structure that then experiences again the habitual strain magnitude. Reductions in strain magnitude supposedly induce resorption to reduce tissue mass and architectural properties so that the lower loading restores habitual strain magnitude. That widely held belief of a single unifying number of strain is fundamentally flawed. The purpose of this article is to explain the real basis of the mechanostat; that the skeleton responds to a complex strain stimulus, made up of numerous different parameters, of which peak magnitude is only one, and that the strain stimulus is different in different parts of the skeleton, so there is no universal number to describe a tissue strain magnitude that underlies the mechanostat's setting. Furthermore, males and females have different responses to loading, and those responses change in response to many factors including genetic constitution, age, concomitant disease, nutrient availability, and exposure to drugs or biochemicals. In summary then, there is not a single mechanostat controlling the skeleton of each of us. At a fundamental tissue level, small functional units of bone each have their own multifactorial threshold target strain stimuli for a given set of dynamic modifying influences. Understanding the biology behind the way that each of these mechanostats functions independently is likely to have pervasive consequences on our ability to control bone mass by manipulation of loading, either directly through different exercise regimens, or in a targeted manner using tailored site and individual specific pharmaceuticals.