Developing and implementing new safe practices: voluntary adoption through statewide collaboratives
- PMID: 16885255
- PMCID: PMC2564013
- DOI: 10.1136/qshc.2005.017632
Developing and implementing new safe practices: voluntary adoption through statewide collaboratives
Abstract
Background: Disseminating new safe practices has proved challenging. In a statewide initiative we developed a framework for (1) selecting two safe practices, (2) developing operational details of implementation, (3) enlisting hospitals to participate, and (4) facilitating implementation.
Methods: Potential topics were selected by a multistep process to identify candidate practices, review the evidence for efficacy and feasibility, and then select them on the basis of importance, efficacy, feasibility, and impact. A multi-stakeholder advisory group representing all constituencies selected two practices: reconciling medications (RM) and communicating critical test results (CTR). Operational details and strategies for implementation were then developed for each practice using a consensus process of discipline stakeholders led by content experts. Hospital CEOs were solicited to participate by the Massachusetts Hospital Association which made the project a "flagship" initiative. A collaborative model was used to facilitate implementation, following the IHI Model for Improvement. In addition to providing exposure to content and method experts, we gave teams a "toolkit" containing recommendations, a change package, and implementation strategies. Each collaborative met four times over an 18 month period. Results were assessed using the IHI team assessment scale and surveys of teams and hospital leaders.
Results: Hospital participation rate was high with 88% of hospitals participating in one or both collaboratives. Partial implementation of the practices was achieved by 50% of RM teams and 65% of CTR teams. Full implementation was achieved by 20% of teams for each.
Conclusions: Major factors leading to hospital participation included the intrinsic appeal of the practices, access to experts, and the availability of implementation strategies. Team success was correlated with active engagement of a senior administrator, engagement of physicians, increased use of PDSA cycles, and attendance at collaborative meetings. The prior development of subpractices, recommendations and implementation strategies was essential for the hospital teams. These should be well worked out before hospitals are required to implement any guideline.
Conflict of interest statement
Competing interests: none declared.
Similar articles
-
Reconciling medications at admission: safe practice recommendations and implementation strategies.Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2006 Jan;32(1):37-50. doi: 10.1016/s1553-7250(06)32006-5. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2006. PMID: 16514938
-
Coaching and leadership for the diffusion of innovation in health care: a different type of multi-organization improvement collaborative.Jt Comm J Qual Improv. 2002 Feb;28(2):55-71. doi: 10.1016/s1070-3241(02)28006-2. Jt Comm J Qual Improv. 2002. PMID: 11838297
-
A multihospital safety improvement effort and the dissemination of new knowledge.Jt Comm J Qual Saf. 2003 Mar;29(3):124-33. doi: 10.1016/s1549-3741(03)29015-8. Jt Comm J Qual Saf. 2003. PMID: 12635428
-
Making health care safer: a critical analysis of patient safety practices.Evid Rep Technol Assess (Summ). 2001;(43):i-x, 1-668. Evid Rep Technol Assess (Summ). 2001. PMID: 11510252 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Health professionals' experience of teamwork education in acute hospital settings: a systematic review of qualitative literature.JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Apr;14(4):96-137. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-1843. JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016. PMID: 27532314 Review.
Cited by
-
Process evaluation of a data-driven quality improvement program within a cluster randomised controlled trial to improve coronary heart disease management in Australian primary care.PLoS One. 2024 Jun 4;19(6):e0298777. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0298777. eCollection 2024. PLoS One. 2024. PMID: 38833486 Free PMC article.
-
How do healthcare providers use national audit data for improvement?BMC Health Serv Res. 2023 Apr 24;23(1):393. doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-09334-6. BMC Health Serv Res. 2023. PMID: 37095495 Free PMC article.
-
Impact of externally facilitated continuous quality improvement cohorts on Advanced Access to support primary healthcare teams: protocol for a quasi-randomized cluster trial.BMC Prim Care. 2023 Apr 11;24(1):97. doi: 10.1186/s12875-023-02048-y. BMC Prim Care. 2023. PMID: 37038126 Free PMC article.
-
Evaluating Quality in Adult Cardiac Surgery.Tex Heart Inst J. 2021 Jan 1;48(1):e197136. doi: 10.14503/THIJ-19-7136. Tex Heart Inst J. 2021. PMID: 33946105 Free PMC article. Review.
-
In-situ Simulation Use for Rapid Implementation and Process Improvement of COVID-19 Airway Management.West J Emerg Med. 2020 Sep 24;21(6):99-106. doi: 10.5811/westjem.2020.7.48159. West J Emerg Med. 2020. PMID: 33052819 Free PMC article.
References
-
- National Quality Forum (NQF) Safe practices for better health care: a consensus report. Washington, DC: NQF, 2003
-
- Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations (JCAHO) Introduction to the national patient safety goals. Available at www.jointcommission.org/PatientSafety/NationalPatientSafetyGoals/npsg_in... (accessed 16 March 2006)
-
- Institute for Healthcare Improvement (IHI) The Breakthrough Series: IHI's collaborative model for achieving breakthrough improvement. Boston, MA: Institute for Healthcare Improvement, 2003
-
- National Quality Forum (NQF) The National Quality Forum's consensus development process. Version 1. 7. Washington, DC: NQF, 2004. www.qualityforum.org/txconsensusprocessversion1‐7COLOR+attach1.pdf (accessed 10 February 2006)
-
- National Quality Forum (NQF) Serious reportable events in healthcare. Washington, DC: NQF, 2002
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous