Recent theoretical analysis supports the possibility that using a linked earlobe reference in EEG studies might appreciatively distort the measured electrical field due to current flow over a low resistance path across the wire joining both ears. Such an effect would invalidate published quantitative EEG norms. Evidence for the balancing effect of this distortion was sought for in the EEG of 4 patients with well localized unilateral lesions, a situation in which this distortion would be most apparent. Statistical tests failed to reveal significant differences between EEGs recorded when ears were linked or unlinked. An analysis of the equivalent circuit reveals that a high skin/electrode impedance effectively makes the linked ear reference behave as an ordinary reference.