Skip to main page content
Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2006 Aug;3(8):439-48.
doi: 10.1038/ncpuro0556.

Primer: Using Decision Analysis to Improve Clinical Decision Making in Urology

Affiliations
Review

Primer: Using Decision Analysis to Improve Clinical Decision Making in Urology

Elena B Elkin et al. Nat Clin Pract Urol. .

Abstract

Many clinical decisions in urology involve uncertainty about the course of disease or the effectiveness of treatment. Many decisions also involve trade-offs; for example, an improvement in patient survival at the cost of an increased risk of treatment-related adverse effects. Decision analysis is a formal, quantitative method for systematically comparing the benefits and harms of alternative clinical strategies under circumstances of uncertainty. The basic steps in performing a decision analysis are to define the clinical scenario or problem, identify the clinical strategies to be considered in the decision, enumerate all of the important sequelae of each strategy and their associated probabilities, define the outcome of interest, and assign a value to each possible outcome. Health outcomes can be defined in a number of ways, including quality-adjusted survival. A key aspect of decision analysis is allowing the values of particular health outcomes to vary from patient to patient, depending on individual preferences. Decision analysis has already been used to assess a variety of prevention, screening and treatment decisions in urology, and there is much potential for its future application. Greater incorporation of decision-analytic techniques into urology research and clinical practice might improve decision making, and thereby improve patient outcomes.

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by 5 articles

LinkOut - more resources

Feedback