Quality of life in Polish respondents: psychometric properties of the Polish WHOQOL-Bref
- PMID: 16922978
- DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-6712.2006.00401.x
Quality of life in Polish respondents: psychometric properties of the Polish WHOQOL-Bref
Abstract
The aim of this study was to examine the validity and reliability of the Polish WHOQOL - Bref in a sample of 908 respondents. The Bref is a generic quality of life (QoL) instrument designed for cross - cultural use. Correlational and multivariate analyses confirmed the relevancy of individual items and domains supporting the construct validity of the scale. Multiple regression analyses of the domain scores with two overall questions (dependent variable) showed that all four domains made a significant contribution in explaining the variance in overall QoL. The psychological domain made the strongest contribution (unstandardized B coefficient = 0.10, r2 = 0.41), followed by the social, environmental and physical domains. When overall health satisfaction was considered as the dependent variable, the physical domain contributed most strongly (unstandardized B coefficient = 0.21, r2= 0.43) followed by the psychological and environmental domains. Exploratory factor analyses resulted in a four factors solution with 24 items explaining 49.6% of the cumulative variance. Confirmatory factor analyses lended marginal support for the goodness of fit of the four-domain model. The physical domain was found to be strongest in differentiating between unhealthy and healthy subjects, followed by psychological and social domains. Acceptable internal consistency was shown with Cronbach's alpha coefficients being greater than 0.70 for all domains with the exception of the social domain. Further exploration of the scales validity and conceptual clarity need further testing in Polish and international samples.
Similar articles
-
Reliability and validity of the Norwegian WHOQOL-OLD module.Scand J Caring Sci. 2008 Jun;22(2):292-305. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-6712.2007.00523.x. Scand J Caring Sci. 2008. PMID: 18489700
-
The suitability of the World Health Organization Quality of Life Instrument-BREF in cancer relatives.Cancer Nurs. 2008 Jan-Feb;31(1):11-22. doi: 10.1097/01.NCC.0000305678.21390.f4. Cancer Nurs. 2008. PMID: 18176126
-
Field testing the WHOQOL-100 in Canada.Can J Nurs Res. 2006 Sep;38(3):106-23. Can J Nurs Res. 2006. PMID: 17037116
-
[Culture and quality of life assessment in Chinese populations].Sichuan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban. 2010 Jul;41(4):678-83. Sichuan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban. 2010. PMID: 20848795 Chinese.
-
Quality of life of older adults in Canada and Brazil.West J Nurs Res. 2007 Feb;29(1):10-26; discussion 27-35. doi: 10.1177/0193945906292550. West J Nurs Res. 2007. PMID: 17228059
Cited by
-
Long-term pulmonary outcomes of young adults born prematurely: a Polish prospective cohort study PREMATURITAS 20.BMC Pulm Med. 2024 Mar 12;24(1):126. doi: 10.1186/s12890-024-02939-5. BMC Pulm Med. 2024. PMID: 38475760 Free PMC article.
-
How Does Aphasia Affect Quality of Life? Preliminary Reports.J Clin Med. 2023 Dec 14;12(24):7687. doi: 10.3390/jcm12247687. J Clin Med. 2023. PMID: 38137755 Free PMC article.
-
The Prevalence of Neck and Back Pain among Paramedics in Poland.J Clin Med. 2023 Nov 13;12(22):7060. doi: 10.3390/jcm12227060. J Clin Med. 2023. PMID: 38002673 Free PMC article.
-
Quality of Life of Polish Patients with Lymphoma Treated Systemically.Nurs Rep. 2023 Oct 9;13(4):1421-1431. doi: 10.3390/nursrep13040119. Nurs Rep. 2023. PMID: 37873826 Free PMC article.
-
Anxiety and Health Concerns among Healthcare Personnel Working with COVID-19 Patients: A Self-Assessment Study.Med Sci Monit. 2023 Sep 24;29:e940766. doi: 10.12659/MSM.940766. Med Sci Monit. 2023. PMID: 37742068 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
