Long-term outcomes after endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair: the first decade
- PMID: 16926569
- PMCID: PMC1856532
- DOI: 10.1097/01.sla.0000234893.88045.dc
Long-term outcomes after endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair: the first decade
Abstract
Objective: The proper role of endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR) remains controversial, largely due to uncertain late results. We reviewed a 12-year experience with EVAR to document late outcomes.
Methods: During the interval January 7, 1994 through December 31, 2005, 873 patients underwent EVAR utilizing 10 different stent graft devices. Primary outcomes examined included operative mortality, aneurysm rupture, aneurysm-related mortality, open surgical conversion, and late survival rates. The incidence of endoleak, migration, aneurysm enlargement, and graft patency was also determined. Finally, the need for reintervention and success of such secondary procedures were evaluated. Kaplan-Meier and multivariate methodology were used for analysis.
Results: Mean patient age was 75.7 years (range, 49-99 years); 81.4% were male. Mean follow-up was 27 months; 39.3% of patients had 2 or more major comorbidities, and 19.5% would be categorized as unfit for open repair. On an intent-to-treat basis, device deployment was successful in 99.3%. Thirty-day mortality was 1.8%. By Kaplan-Meier analysis, freedom from AAA rupture was 97.6% at 5 years and 94% at 9 years. Significant risk factors for late AAA rupture included female gender (odds ratio OR, 6.9; P = 0.004) and device-related endoleak (OR, 16.06; P = 0.009). Aneurysm-related death was avoided in 96.1% of patients, with the need for any reintervention (OR, 5.7 P = 0.006), family history of aneurysmal disease (OR, 9.5; P = 0.075), and renal insufficiency (OR, 7.1; P = 0.003) among its most important predictors. 87 (10%) patients required reintervention, with 92% of such procedures being catheter-based and a success rate of 84%. Significant predictors of reintervention included use of first-generation devices (OR, 1.2; P < 0.01) and late onset endoleak (OR, 64; P < 0.001). Current generation stent grafts correlated with significantly improved outcomes. Cumulative freedom from conversion to open repair was 93.3% at 5 through 9 years, with the need for prior reintervention (OR, 16.7; P = 0.001) its most important predictor. Cumulative survival was 52% at 5 years.
Conclusions: EVAR using contemporary devices is a safe, effective, and durable method to prevent AAA rupture and aneurysm-related death. Assuming suitable AAA anatomy, these data justify a broad application of EVAR across a wide spectrum of patients.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Endovascular repair of ruptured infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm is associated with lower 30-day mortality and better 5-year survival rates than open surgical repair.J Vasc Surg. 2013 Feb;57(2):368-75. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2012.09.003. Epub 2012 Dec 21. J Vasc Surg. 2013. PMID: 23265582
-
Outcomes following endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR): an anatomic and device-specific analysis.J Vasc Surg. 2008 Jul;48(1):19-28. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2008.02.003. Epub 2008 Apr 28. J Vasc Surg. 2008. PMID: 18440182
-
Endovascular aortic aneurysm repair by a multidisciplinary team: lessons learned and six-year clinical update.Cardiovasc J S Afr. 2005 Jan-Feb;16(1):36-47. Cardiovasc J S Afr. 2005. PMID: 15778773
-
Comparison of endovascular and open surgical repairs for abdominal aortic aneurysm.Evid Rep Technol Assess (Full Rep). 2006 Aug;(144):1-113. Evid Rep Technol Assess (Full Rep). 2006. PMID: 17764213 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Systematic review and meta-analysis of the early and late outcomes of open and endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm.Br J Surg. 2013 Jun;100(7):863-72. doi: 10.1002/bjs.9101. Epub 2013 Mar 8. Br J Surg. 2013. PMID: 23475697 Review.
Cited by
-
The impact of completion and follow-up endoleaks on survival, reintervention, and rupture.J Vasc Surg. 2023 Jun;77(6):1676-1684. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2023.02.009. Epub 2023 Feb 24. J Vasc Surg. 2023. PMID: 36841312 Free PMC article. Review.
-
The Technological Advancement to Engineer Next-Generation Stent-Grafts: Design, Material, and Fabrication Techniques.Adv Healthc Mater. 2022 Jul;11(13):e2200271. doi: 10.1002/adhm.202200271. Epub 2022 May 16. Adv Healthc Mater. 2022. PMID: 35481675 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Imaging modalities for endoleak surveillance.J Med Radiat Sci. 2021 Dec;68(4):446-452. doi: 10.1002/jmrs.522. Epub 2021 Jun 18. J Med Radiat Sci. 2021. PMID: 34145780 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Minimizing Population Health Loss in Times of Scarce Surgical Capacity During the Coronavirus Disease 2019 Crisis and Beyond: A Modeling Study.Value Health. 2021 May;24(5):648-657. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2020.12.010. Epub 2021 Mar 5. Value Health. 2021. PMID: 33933233 Free PMC article.
-
Comparing and Correlating Outcomes between Open and Percutaneous Access in Endovascular Aneurysm Repair in Aortic Aneurysms Using a Retrospective Cohort Study Design.Int J Vasc Med. 2020 Nov 27;2020:8823039. doi: 10.1155/2020/8823039. eCollection 2020. Int J Vasc Med. 2020. PMID: 33312729 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Parodi JC, Palmaz JC, Barone HD. Transfemoral intraluminal graft implantation for abdominal aortic aneurysms. Ann Vasc Surg. 1991;5:491–499. - PubMed
-
- Zarins CK, White RA, Schwarten D, et al. AneuRx stent graft versus open surgical repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms: multicenter prospective clinical trial. J Vasc Surg. 1999;29:292–308. - PubMed
-
- Moore WS, Brewster DC, Bernhard VM. Aorto-uni-iliac endograft for complex aortoiliac aneurysms compared with tube/bifurcation endografts: results of the EVT/Guidant trials. J Vasc Surg. 2001;33(suppl):11–20. - PubMed
-
- Matsumura JS, Brewster DC, Makaroun MS, et al. A multicenter controlled clinical trial of open versus endovascular treatment of abdominal aortic aneurysm. J Vasc Surg. 2003;37:262–271. - PubMed
-
- Greenberg RK, Chuter TAM, Sternberg C, et al. Zenith AAA endovascular graft: intermediate-term results of the US multicenter trial. J Vasc Surg. 2004;39:1209–1218. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
