Variance estimation, design effects, and sample size calculations for respondent-driven sampling

J Urban Health. 2006 Nov;83(6 Suppl):i98-112. doi: 10.1007/s11524-006-9106-x.


Hidden populations, such as injection drug users and sex workers, are central to a number of public health problems. However, because of the nature of these groups, it is difficult to collect accurate information about them, and this difficulty complicates disease prevention efforts. A recently developed statistical approach called respondent-driven sampling improves our ability to study hidden populations by allowing researchers to make unbiased estimates of the prevalence of certain traits in these populations. Yet, not enough is known about the sample-to-sample variability of these prevalence estimates. In this paper, we present a bootstrap method for constructing confidence intervals around respondent-driven sampling estimates and demonstrate in simulations that it outperforms the naive method currently in use. We also use simulations and real data to estimate the design effects for respondent-driven sampling in a number of situations. We conclude with practical advice about the power calculations that are needed to determine the appropriate sample size for a study using respondent-driven sampling. In general, we recommend a sample size twice as large as would be needed under simple random sampling.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
  • Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S.
  • Review

MeSH terms

  • Analysis of Variance
  • Data Collection / methods*
  • Epidemiologic Research Design*
  • Humans
  • Sample Size*
  • Sampling Studies*
  • Sexually Transmitted Diseases / epidemiology*
  • Sexually Transmitted Diseases / transmission