Reliability of retrospective assessments of childhood experiences in Germany

J Nerv Ment Dis. 2006 Sep;194(9):676-83. doi: 10.1097/01.nmd.0000235789.79491.1b.

Abstract

The retrospective assessment of adverse childhood experiences is a widely used technique. Few studies report heterogeneous results about the reliability and objectivity. A sample of 100 patients was independently interviewed by means of the Mainz Structured Biographical Interview by two different interviewers with mean time lag of 2.2 years. Reliability of reports of family situation, physical abuse, sexual abuse, and protective factors was assessed. The results show moderate to good reliability for most childhood experiences. Divorce/separation of parents had a kappa of .95, severe sexual abuse a kappa of .64, and regular harsh physical abuse a kappa of .56; protective factors were in the .50 range. The key features for obtaining good reliability seem to be the concreteness of the question and accuracy of the coding categories. There is some, but little, evidence that sensitive issues such as sexual abuse are more prone to errors in assessment than simple ones.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study
  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Child
  • Child Abuse / diagnosis*
  • Child Abuse / psychology
  • Child Abuse / statistics & numerical data
  • Child Abuse, Sexual / diagnosis
  • Child Abuse, Sexual / psychology
  • Child Abuse, Sexual / statistics & numerical data
  • Data Collection / standards
  • Data Collection / statistics & numerical data*
  • Divorce / psychology
  • Divorce / statistics & numerical data
  • Family Relations
  • Female
  • Forms and Records Control / standards
  • Germany / epidemiology
  • Humans
  • Interviews as Topic / standards
  • Male
  • Mental Recall
  • Middle Aged
  • Reproducibility of Results
  • Research Design
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Surveys and Questionnaires / standards