Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2006 Sep 16;333(7568):597-600.
doi: 10.1136/bmj.333.7568.597.

The case of the misleading funnel plot

Joseph Lau  1 , John P A Ioannidis, Norma Terrin, Christopher H Schmid, Ingram Olkin
Affiliations
Review

The case of the misleading funnel plot

Joseph Lau et al. BMJ. .

Abstract

Evidence based medicine insists on rigorous standards to appraise clinical interventions. Failure to apply the same rules to its own tools could be equally damaging

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1
Effect of measure of precision (plotted on y axis) on appearance of funnel plots. Redrawn from Tang and Liu
Fig 2
Fig 2
Effect of grouping of data on impression of funnel plot for meta-analysis of inhaled disodium cromoglicate that found significant heterogeneity
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Light RJ, Pillemer DB. Summing up. The science of reviewing research. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1984.
    1. Egger M, Davey Smith G, Schneider M, Minder C. Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test. BMJ 1997;315: 629-34. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Alderson P, Green S, Higgins JPT, eds. Cochrane reviewers' handbook 4.2.2 [updated March 2004]. In: Cochrane Library, Issue 1. Chichester: Wiley, 2004.
    1. Moher D, Cook DJ, Eastwood S, Olkin I, Rennie D, Stroup DF. Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement. Quality of Reporting of Meta-analyses. Lancet 1999;354: 1896-900. - PubMed
    1. Stroup DF, Berlin JA, Morton SC, Olkin I, Williamson GD, Rennie D, et al. Meta-analysis of observational studies in epidemiology: a proposal for reporting. Meta-analysis Of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (MOOSE) group. JAMA 2000;283: 2008-12. - PubMed

Publication types