Skip to main page content
Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
, 256 Suppl 1, i3-11

Psychopathological Rating Scales for Diagnostic Use in Adults With Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD)

Affiliations
Review

Psychopathological Rating Scales for Diagnostic Use in Adults With Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD)

M Rösler et al. Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci.

Erratum in

  • Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2008 Apr;258(3):192-3

Abstract

The diagnosis of attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) in adults is a complex procedure which should include retrospective assessment of childhood ADHD symptoms either by patient recall or third party information, diagnostic criteria according to DSM-IV, current adult ADHD psychopathology including symptom severity and pervasiveness, functional impairment, quality of life and comorbidity. In order to obtain a systematic database for the diagnosis and evaluation of the course ADHD rating scales can be very useful. This article reviews rating instruments that have found general acceptance. The Wender-Utah Rating Scale (WURS) and the Childhood Symptoms Scale by Barkley and Murphy try to make a retrospective assessment of childhood ADHD symptoms. The Connors Adult ADHD Rating Scales (CAARS), the Current Symptoms Scales by Barkley and Murphy (CSS), the Adult Self Report Scale (ASRS) by Adler et al. and Kessler et al. or the Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder--Self Report Scale (ADHD-SR by Rösler et al.) are self report rating scales focusing mainly on the DSM-IV criteria. The CAARS and the CSS have other report forms too. The Brown ADD Rating Scale (Brown ADD-RS) and the Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder--Other Report Scale (ADHD-OR by Rösler et al.) are instruments for use by clinicians or significant others. Both self rating scales and observer report scales quantify the ADHD symptoms by use of a Likert scale mostly ranging from 0 to 3. This makes the instruments useful to follow the course of the disease quantitatively. Comprehensive diagnostic interviews not only evaluate diagnostic criteria, but also assess different psychopathological syndrome scores, functional disability measures, indices of pervasiveness and information about comorbid disorders. The most comprehensive procedures are the Brown ADD Diagnostic Form and the Adult Interview (AI) by Barkley and Murphy. An instrument of particular interest is the Wender Reimherr Interview (WRI) which follows a diagnostic algorithm different from DSM-IV. The interview contains only items delineated from adult psychopathology and not derived from symptoms originally designed for use in children. Other instruments focus on functional impairment, quality of life, comorbid disorders, gender effects and specific psychopathological models.

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by 32 articles

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Biol Psychiatry. 2003 Jan 15;53(2):112-20 - PubMed
    1. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1993 Jul;50(7):565-76 - PubMed
    1. Psychiatry Res. 1984 Sep;13(1):19-29 - PubMed
    1. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2000 May;39(5):627-34 - PubMed
    1. Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2004 Dec;254(6):365-71 - PubMed
Feedback