Noninvasive detection of coronary artery stenoses with multislice computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging
- PMID: 16983128
- DOI: 10.7326/0003-4819-145-6-200609190-00004
Noninvasive detection of coronary artery stenoses with multislice computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging
Abstract
Background: Multislice computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) are the main candidates for noninvasive coronary angiography; however, multislice CT, unlike MRI, exposes patients to radiation and an iodinated intravenous contrast agent.
Objective: To compare the diagnostic accuracy of multislice CT and MRI for noninvasive detection of clinically significant coronary stenoses (> or =50%).
Design: Prospective intention-to-diagnose study.
Setting: Single tertiary referral center, Berlin, Germany.
Patients: 129 consecutive patients with suspected coronary artery disease.
Interventions: Multislice CT and MRI were both performed within a median of 1 day before conventional coronary angiography, which served as the reference standard.
Measurements: Diagnostic performance of multislice CT and MRI.
Results: 129 patients completed the study. Altogether, 108 patients with 430 vessels could be examined with both multislice CT and MRI and were used for analysis. In the per-patient analysis, the sensitivity of multislice CT (92% [95% CI, 82% to 96%]) was significantly higher than that of MRI (74% [CI, 61% to 83%]; P = 0.013). The sensitivity for detecting clinically significant stenoses was 82% for multislice CT and 54% for MRI (P < 0.001). Specificity and negative predictive value of multislice CT and MRI in the per-vessel analysis were 90% versus 87% (P = 0.73) and 95% versus 90% (P = 0.032), respectively. The effective radiation dose used with multislice CT (mean, 12.3 mSv [SD, 1.4]) in a consecutive subgroup of 73 patients was not significantly different from that used with diagnostic cardiac catheterization (11.4 mSv [SD, 4.8]) (P = 0.169). Most patients (74%) indicated that they would prefer multislice CT for future diagnostic imaging (P < 0.001).
Limitations: This was a single-center study with 129 patients.
Conclusions: In patients referred for conventional coronary angiography, multislice CT compares favorably with MRI for noninvasive detection of coronary stenoses.
Comment in
-
Who is a candidate for noninvasive coronary angiography?Ann Intern Med. 2006 Sep 19;145(6):466-7. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-145-6-200609190-00012. Ann Intern Med. 2006. PMID: 16983136 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
A prospective study for comparison of MR and CT imaging for detection of coronary artery stenosis.JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2011 Jan;4(1):50-61. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2010.10.007. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2011. PMID: 21232704
-
Noninvasive coronary angiography by 320-row computed tomography with lower radiation exposure and maintained diagnostic accuracy: comparison of results with cardiac catheterization in a head-to-head pilot investigation.Circulation. 2009 Sep 8;120(10):867-75. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.109.859280. Epub 2009 Aug 24. Circulation. 2009. PMID: 19704093 Clinical Trial.
-
Whole-heart coronary magnetic resonance angiography: value for the detection of coronary artery stenoses in comparison to multislice computed tomography angiography.Acta Radiol. 2007 Nov;48(9):967-73. doi: 10.1080/02841850701630292. Acta Radiol. 2007. PMID: 17957510
-
Meta-analysis of comparative diagnostic performance of magnetic resonance imaging and multislice computed tomography for noninvasive coronary angiography.Am Heart J. 2006 Feb;151(2):404-11. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2005.03.022. Am Heart J. 2006. PMID: 16442907 Review.
-
Prospective versus retrospective ECG-gated multislice CT coronary angiography: a systematic review of radiation dose and diagnostic accuracy.Eur J Radiol. 2012 Feb;81(2):e94-100. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2011.01.070. Epub 2011 Feb 12. Eur J Radiol. 2012. PMID: 21316887 Review.
Cited by
-
The effectiveness of coronary computed tomography angiography and functional testing for the diagnosis of obstructive coronary artery disease: results from the individual patient data Collaborative Meta-Analysis of Cardiac CT (COME-CCT).Insights Imaging. 2024 Aug 14;15(1):208. doi: 10.1186/s13244-024-01702-y. Insights Imaging. 2024. PMID: 39143443 Free PMC article.
-
Diagnostic accuracy of whole heart coronary magnetic resonance angiography: a systematic review and meta-analysis.J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2023 Jun 26;25(1):36. doi: 10.1186/s12968-023-00949-6. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2023. PMID: 37357310 Free PMC article.
-
A direct comparison of 3 T contrast-enhanced whole-heart coronary cardiovascular magnetic resonance angiography to dual-source computed tomography angiography for detection of coronary artery stenosis: a single-center experience.J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2020 Jun 1;22(1):40. doi: 10.1186/s12968-020-00630-2. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2020. PMID: 32475355 Free PMC article.
-
Free breathing three-dimensional cardiac quantitative susceptibility mapping for differential cardiac chamber blood oxygenation - initial validation in patients with cardiovascular disease inclusive of direct comparison to invasive catheterization.J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2019 Nov 18;21(1):70. doi: 10.1186/s12968-019-0579-7. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2019. PMID: 31735165 Free PMC article.
-
A Pilot Study of Third-Generation Dual-Source Computed Tomography for the Assessment of Global Dynamic Changes in Left Ventricular Structure and Function in a Porcine Model of Acute Myocardial Infarction.Med Sci Monit. 2019 Oct 25;25:7989-7997. doi: 10.12659/MSM.919122. Med Sci Monit. 2019. PMID: 31649233 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical