DNA adduct formation and mutation induction by aristolochic acid in rat kidney and liver
- PMID: 17010389
- PMCID: PMC6370021
- DOI: 10.1016/j.mrfmmm.2006.08.004
DNA adduct formation and mutation induction by aristolochic acid in rat kidney and liver
Abstract
Aristolochic acid (AA) is a potent nephrotoxin and carcinogen and is the causative factor for Chinese herb nephropathy. AA has been associated with the development of urothelial cancer in humans, and kidney and forestomach tumors in rodents. To investigate the molecular mechanisms responsible for the tumorigenicity of AA, we determined the DNA adduct formation and mutagenicity of AA in the liver (nontarget tissue) and kidney (target tissue) of Big Blue rats. Groups of six male rats were gavaged with 0, 0.1, 1.0 and 10.0 mg AA/kg body weight five times/week for 3 months. The rats were sacrificed 1 day after the final treatment, and the livers and kidneys were isolated. DNA adduct formation was analyzed by 32P-postlabeling and mutant frequency (MF) was determined using the lambda Select-cII Mutation Detection System. Three major adducts (7-[deoxyadenosin-N6-yl]-aristolactam I, 7-[deoxyadenosin-N6-yl]-aristolactam II and 7-[deoxyguanosin-N2-yl]-aristolactam I) were identified. There were strong linear dose-responses for AA-induced DNA adducts in treated rats, ranging from 25 to 1967 adducts/10(8) nucleotides in liver and 95-4598 adducts/10(8) nucleotides in kidney. A similar trend of dose-responses for mutation induction also was found, the MFs ranging from 37 to 666 x 10(-6) in liver compared with the MFs of 78-1319 x 10(-6) that we previously reported for the kidneys of AA-treated rats. Overall, kidneys had at least two-fold higher levels of DNA adducts and MF than livers. Sequence analysis of the cII mutants revealed that there was a statistically significant difference between the mutation spectra in both kidney and liver of AA-treated and control rats, but there was no significant difference between the mutation spectra in AA-treated livers and kidneys. A:T-->T:A transversion was the predominant mutation in AA-treated rats; whereas G:C-->A:T transition was the main type of mutation in control rats. These results indicate that the AA treatment that eventually results in kidney tumors in rats also results in significant increases in DNA adduct formation and cII MF in kidney. Although the same treatment does not produce tumors in rat liver, it does induce DNA adducts and mutations in this tissue, albeit at lower levels than in kidney.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Mutagenicity and DNA adduct formation by aristolochic acid in the spleen of Big Blue® rats.Environ Mol Mutagen. 2012 Jun;53(5):358-68. doi: 10.1002/em.21696. Epub 2012 Apr 17. Environ Mol Mutagen. 2012. PMID: 22508110 Free PMC article.
-
32P-post-labelling analysis of DNA adducts formed by aristolochic acid in tissues from patients with Chinese herbs nephropathy.Carcinogenesis. 1997 May;18(5):1063-7. doi: 10.1093/carcin/18.5.1063. Carcinogenesis. 1997. PMID: 9163697
-
Quantitative determination of aristolochic acid-derived DNA adducts in rats using 32P-postlabeling/polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis analysis.Drug Metab Dispos. 2006 Jul;34(7):1122-7. doi: 10.1124/dmd.105.008706. Epub 2006 Apr 12. Drug Metab Dispos. 2006. PMID: 16611860
-
Aristolochic acid as a probable human cancer hazard in herbal remedies: a review.Mutagenesis. 2002 Jul;17(4):265-77. doi: 10.1093/mutage/17.4.265. Mutagenesis. 2002. PMID: 12110620 Review.
-
The role of biotransformation enzymes in the development of renal injury and urothelial cancer caused by aristolochic acid: urgent questions and difficult answers.Biomed Pap Med Fac Univ Palacky Olomouc Czech Repub. 2009 Mar;153(1):5-11. doi: 10.5507/bp.2009.001. Biomed Pap Med Fac Univ Palacky Olomouc Czech Repub. 2009. PMID: 19365519 Review.
Cited by
-
Toxicogenomics and cancer susceptibility: advances with next-generation sequencing.J Environ Sci Health C Environ Carcinog Ecotoxicol Rev. 2014;32(2):121-58. doi: 10.1080/10590501.2014.907460. J Environ Sci Health C Environ Carcinog Ecotoxicol Rev. 2014. PMID: 24875441 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Transgenic rat models for mutagenesis and carcinogenesis.Genes Environ. 2017 Feb 1;39:11. doi: 10.1186/s41021-016-0072-6. eCollection 2017. Genes Environ. 2017. PMID: 28174618 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Comparison of the oxidation of carcinogenic aristolochic acid I and II by microsomal cytochromes P450 in vitro: experimental and theoretical approaches.Monatsh Chem. 2017;148(11):1971-1981. doi: 10.1007/s00706-017-2014-9. Epub 2017 Jul 26. Monatsh Chem. 2017. PMID: 29104318 Free PMC article.
-
Genomics of Viral Hepatitis-Associated Liver Tumors.J Clin Med. 2021 Apr 22;10(9):1827. doi: 10.3390/jcm10091827. J Clin Med. 2021. PMID: 33922394 Free PMC article. Review.
-
The in vitro and in vivo anti-tumor effect of KO-202125, a sauristolactam derivative, as a novel epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitor in human breast cancer.Cancer Sci. 2011 Mar;102(3):597-604. doi: 10.1111/j.1349-7006.2010.01817.x. Epub 2011 Jan 10. Cancer Sci. 2011. PMID: 21205071 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Mengs U, Lang W, Poch JA, The carcinogenic action of aristolochic acid in rats, Arch. Toxicol 51 (1982) 107–119.
-
- Mengs U, Tumour induction in mice following exposure to aristolochic acid, Arch. Toxicol 61 (1988) 504–505. - PubMed
-
- Schmeiser HH, Pool BL, Wiessler M, Mutagenicity of the two main components of commercially available carcinogenic aristolochic acid in Salmonella typhimurium, Cancer Lett 23 (1984) 97–101. - PubMed
-
- Pezzuto JM, Swanson SM, Mar W, Che CT, Cordell GA, Fong HH, Evaluation of the mutagenic and cytostatic potential of aristolochic acid (3,4-methylenedioxy-8-methoxy-10nitrophenanthrene-1-carboxylic acid) and several of its derivatives, Mutat. Res 206 (1988) 447–454. - PubMed
-
- Schmeiser HH, Pool BL, Wiessler M, Identification and mutagenicity of metabolites of aristolochic acid formed by rat liver, Carcinogenesis 7 (1986) 59–63. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
