Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2006 Dec 1;602(1-2):83-91.
doi: 10.1016/j.mrfmmm.2006.08.004. Epub 2006 Sep 28.

DNA adduct formation and mutation induction by aristolochic acid in rat kidney and liver

Affiliations
Comparative Study

DNA adduct formation and mutation induction by aristolochic acid in rat kidney and liver

Nan Mei et al. Mutat Res. .

Abstract

Aristolochic acid (AA) is a potent nephrotoxin and carcinogen and is the causative factor for Chinese herb nephropathy. AA has been associated with the development of urothelial cancer in humans, and kidney and forestomach tumors in rodents. To investigate the molecular mechanisms responsible for the tumorigenicity of AA, we determined the DNA adduct formation and mutagenicity of AA in the liver (nontarget tissue) and kidney (target tissue) of Big Blue rats. Groups of six male rats were gavaged with 0, 0.1, 1.0 and 10.0 mg AA/kg body weight five times/week for 3 months. The rats were sacrificed 1 day after the final treatment, and the livers and kidneys were isolated. DNA adduct formation was analyzed by 32P-postlabeling and mutant frequency (MF) was determined using the lambda Select-cII Mutation Detection System. Three major adducts (7-[deoxyadenosin-N6-yl]-aristolactam I, 7-[deoxyadenosin-N6-yl]-aristolactam II and 7-[deoxyguanosin-N2-yl]-aristolactam I) were identified. There were strong linear dose-responses for AA-induced DNA adducts in treated rats, ranging from 25 to 1967 adducts/10(8) nucleotides in liver and 95-4598 adducts/10(8) nucleotides in kidney. A similar trend of dose-responses for mutation induction also was found, the MFs ranging from 37 to 666 x 10(-6) in liver compared with the MFs of 78-1319 x 10(-6) that we previously reported for the kidneys of AA-treated rats. Overall, kidneys had at least two-fold higher levels of DNA adducts and MF than livers. Sequence analysis of the cII mutants revealed that there was a statistically significant difference between the mutation spectra in both kidney and liver of AA-treated and control rats, but there was no significant difference between the mutation spectra in AA-treated livers and kidneys. A:T-->T:A transversion was the predominant mutation in AA-treated rats; whereas G:C-->A:T transition was the main type of mutation in control rats. These results indicate that the AA treatment that eventually results in kidney tumors in rats also results in significant increases in DNA adduct formation and cII MF in kidney. Although the same treatment does not produce tumors in rat liver, it does induce DNA adducts and mutations in this tissue, albeit at lower levels than in kidney.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1.
Fig. 1.
Relative mean body weight of Big Blue rats treated with AA for 12 weeks. The rat relative body weight was calculated as a ratio of the body weight of rats during the 12-week dosing period to the body weight of 6-week-old rats at the initiation of the treatments. The data represent the means of groups of six rats. (▲) Vehicle control; (■) 0.1 mg/kg of AA; (♦) 1.0 mg/kg of AA; (●) 10.0 mg/kg of AA.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 2.
Representative autoradiographic profiles of AA–DNA adducts detected by the nuclease P1 enrichment version of the 32P-postlabeling assay. Electronic autoradiography was performed for 5–10 min. Ori-gins in the bottom left corners were cut off before exposure. (A) Liver control; (B) AA-treated liver; (C) kidney control; (D) AA-treated kid-ney; spot (1) dA–AAI; spot (2) dG–AAI; spot (3) dA–AAII.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Mengs U, Lang W, Poch JA, The carcinogenic action of aristolochic acid in rats, Arch. Toxicol 51 (1982) 107–119.
    1. Mengs U, Tumour induction in mice following exposure to aristolochic acid, Arch. Toxicol 61 (1988) 504–505. - PubMed
    1. Schmeiser HH, Pool BL, Wiessler M, Mutagenicity of the two main components of commercially available carcinogenic aristolochic acid in Salmonella typhimurium, Cancer Lett 23 (1984) 97–101. - PubMed
    1. Pezzuto JM, Swanson SM, Mar W, Che CT, Cordell GA, Fong HH, Evaluation of the mutagenic and cytostatic potential of aristolochic acid (3,4-methylenedioxy-8-methoxy-10nitrophenanthrene-1-carboxylic acid) and several of its derivatives, Mutat. Res 206 (1988) 447–454. - PubMed
    1. Schmeiser HH, Pool BL, Wiessler M, Identification and mutagenicity of metabolites of aristolochic acid formed by rat liver, Carcinogenesis 7 (1986) 59–63. - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources