Skip to main page content
Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
, 6, 124

Association of Socio-Economic Status With Diabetes Prevalence and Utilization of Diabetes Care Services

Affiliations

Association of Socio-Economic Status With Diabetes Prevalence and Utilization of Diabetes Care Services

Doreen M Rabi et al. BMC Health Serv Res.

Abstract

Background: Low income appears to be associated with a higher prevalence of diabetes and diabetes related complications, however, little is known about how income influences access to diabetes care. The objective of the present study was to determine whether income is associated with referral to a diabetes centre within a universal health care system.

Methods: Data on referral for diabetes care, diabetes prevalence and median household income were obtained from a regional Diabetes Education Centre (DEC) database, the Canadian National Diabetes Surveillance System (NDSS) and the 2001 Canadian Census respectively. Diabetes rate per capita, referral rate per capita and proportion with diabetes referred was determined for census dissemination areas. We used Chi square analyses to determine if diabetes prevalence or population rates of referral differed across income quintiles, and Poisson regression to model diabetes rate and referral rate in relation to income while controlling for education and age.

Results: There was a significant gradient in both diabetes prevalence (chi2 = 743.72, p < 0.0005) and population rates of referral (chi2 = 168.435, p < 0.0005) across income quintiles, with the lowest income quintiles having the highest rates of diabetes and referral to the DEC. Referral rate among those with diabetes, however, was uniform across income quintiles. Controlling for age and education, Poisson regression models confirmed a significant socio-economic gradient in diabetes prevalence and population rates of referral.

Conclusion: Low income is associated with a higher prevalence of diabetes and a higher population rate of referral to this regional DEC. After accounting for diabetes prevalence, however, the equal proportions referred to the DEC across income groups suggest that there is no access bias based on income.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Box plots of diabetes prevalence by income quintile (panel A), population rates of DEC referral by income quintile (panel B), and proportion referred to the DEC among people with diabetes (panel C).

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by 69 articles

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Hattersley L. Trends in life expectancy by social class: An Update. Health Statistics Q. 1999. pp. 16–24.
    1. Marmot MG, Stanfield S, Patel C, North F, Head J, White I, Brunner E, Feeney A, Davey-Smith G. Health inequities among British civil servants: The Whitehall II study. Lancet. 1991;337:1387–93. doi: 10.1016/0140-6736(91)93068-K. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Winkelby M, Cubbin C. Influence of individual and neighbourhood socioeconomic status on mortality among black, Mexican-American and white women and men in the United States. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health. 2003;57:444–452. doi: 10.1136/jech.57.6.444. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Robbins J, Vaccarino V, Zhang H, Kasl S. Socioeconomic status and type 2 diabetes in African American and Non-hispanic white women and men: Evidence from the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. American Journal of Public Health. 91:76–84. - PMC - PubMed
    1. National Public Health Survey. Statistics Canada. 1998.

Publication types

MeSH terms

Feedback