The objective of this study was to quantify the role of maternal effects on docility in Limousin cattle. Docility scores were obtained at weaning while animals were restrained in a squeeze chute. Scores 1 through 6 represented a docile to aggressive temperament, respectively, and were provided by the North American Limousin Foundation. Observations with unknown age of dam, contemporary groups containing less than 10 observations, contemporary groups with no variation, and single-sire contemporary groups were removed, leaving 21,932 observations. A 2-generation pedigree file compiled from animals with observations contained 49,459 animals. Fixed effects were weaning contemporary group and age of dam (2, > or =3 yr). Six animal models encompassed combinations of random factors: direct genetic, maternal genetic, and maternal permanent environmental effects. The model D was the most basic, containing direct genetic and residual effects, and it resembled the method currently used by the North American Limousin Foundation for genetic evaluation of docility. Maternal genetic or permanent environmental effects were separately added to the model D, denoted as models DM and DC, respectively. Model DMC contained all random factors. Models DM-Zero and DMC-Zero were equivalent to models DM and DMC, respectively, but with zero direct-maternal genetic covariance. Direct heritability estimates were moderate for all models (0.29 +/- 0.02 to 0.38 +/- 0.03). Maternal heritability estimates were low, ranging from 0.01 +/- 0.01 (DM-Zero) to 0.05 +/- 0.02 (DM). Negative direct-maternal genetic correlations of -0.41 +/- 0.09 and -0.55 +/- 0.09 were estimated for models DM and DMC, respectively. The proportion of phenotypic variance accounted for by maternal permanent environmental effects was 0.03 +/- 0.01, 0.04 +/- 0.01, and 0.02 +/- 0.01 for models DC, DMC, and DMC-Zero, respectively. Likelihood ratio tests indicated that model DMC best fit the data. Although maternal genetic and maternal permanent environmental effects were significant, they accounted for only 8% (model DMC) of the phenotypic variance, and a Spearman rank correlation of 0.99 between models D and DMC showed sires did not rank differently with or without inclusion of these effects. Given these results, inclusion of maternal effects to the genetic evaluation of docility in Limousin cattle does not seem warranted.