Mega-prizes in medicine: big cash awards may stimulate useful and rapid therapeutic innovation
- PMID: 17052861
- DOI: 10.1016/j.mehy.2006.09.025
Mega-prizes in medicine: big cash awards may stimulate useful and rapid therapeutic innovation
Abstract
Following Horrobin's suggestion of 1986, I argue that offering very large prizes (tens of millions of US dollars, or more) for solving specific therapeutic problems, would be an excellent strategy for promoting the rapid development of effective new treatments. The two mainstream ways of paying for medical research are funding the process with grants or funding the outcome via patent protection. When grants are used to fund the process of research the result tends to be 'pure' science, guided by intrinsic scientific objectives. Practical results, such as useful therapeutic advances, are a by-product. Patent-seeking research, by contrast, is more focused on technology than science. It seeks practical results; and aims to pay for itself (and make a profit) in the long term by generating a patentable product or procedure. Prize-seeking research is subject to different incentives and applicable to different situations than either process-funded or patent-seeking research. Prize seeking researchers have a strong incentive to solve the specified problem as rapidly as possible, but the problem may be solved using old ideas that are scientifically mundane or unpatentable technologies and methods. Prizes therefore seem to generate solutions which are incremental extensions, new applications or novel combinations of already-existing technologies. The main use of mega-prizes in medicine would be to accelerate therapeutic progress in stagnant fields of research and to address urgent problems. For example, medical charities focused on specific diseases should consider accumulating their resources until they can offer a mega-prize for solving a clinical problem of special concern to their patients. Prize money should be big enough to pay for the research and development, the evaluation of the new treatment in a clinical trial, and with a large profit left-over to compensate for the intrinsic risk of competing. Sufficiently large amounts of money, and the prestige and publicity derived from winning a mega-prize, could rapidly mobilize research efforts to discover a whole range of scientifically un-glamorous but clinically-useful therapeutic breakthroughs.
Comment in
-
Prizes to solve problems in and beyond medicine, big and small: it can work.Med Hypotheses. 2007;68(4):732-4. doi: 10.1016/j.mehy.2006.11.017. Med Hypotheses. 2007. PMID: 17207938
Similar articles
-
Stimulating revolutionary science with mega-cash prizes.Med Hypotheses. 2008;70(4):709-13. doi: 10.1016/j.mehy.2008.01.001. Med Hypotheses. 2008. PMID: 18289798
-
Prizes to solve problems in and beyond medicine, big and small: it can work.Med Hypotheses. 2007;68(4):732-4. doi: 10.1016/j.mehy.2006.11.017. Med Hypotheses. 2007. PMID: 17207938
-
The future of 'pure' medical science: the need for a new specialist professional research system.Med Hypotheses. 2005;65(3):419-25. doi: 10.1016/j.mehy.2005.06.001. Med Hypotheses. 2005. PMID: 15985341
-
[Development of antituberculous drugs: current status and future prospects].Kekkaku. 2006 Dec;81(12):753-74. Kekkaku. 2006. PMID: 17240921 Review. Japanese.
-
Experience of King Abdul-Aziz City for science and technology in funding medical research in Saudi Arabia.Saudi Med J. 2004 Jan;25(1 Suppl):S8-12. Saudi Med J. 2004. PMID: 14968184 Review.
Cited by
-
Innovation in neglected tropical disease drug discovery and development.Infect Dis Poverty. 2018 Jun 18;7(1):67. doi: 10.1186/s40249-018-0444-1. Infect Dis Poverty. 2018. PMID: 29950174 Free PMC article. Review.
-
More is less. New developments in funding the life sciences to make research more effective.EMBO Rep. 2007 Jul;8(7):626-8. doi: 10.1038/sj.embor.7401028. EMBO Rep. 2007. PMID: 17603535 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
