Background: B-Type natriuretic peptide (BNP) and NTpro-BNP are widely used for diagnosis and risk stratification of patients with heart failure (HF). Although not currently cleared by the Food and Drug Administration as a test indication, there is interest in using these biomarkers for monitoring the success of HF medications. An assessment of the analytical and biologic variations is necessary to interpret the results of serial testing.
Methods and results: The intra-individual biologic variances and analytical assay variances of BNP and NT-proBNP from healthy subjects and those with stable HF were reviewed. The analytical variability of BNP and NT-proBNP assays was reported, as some have suggested that only the analytical variance is important in interpreting the results of tightly regulated hormones. The reference change values (RCV) for serial measurements were derived and used to interpret results of therapeutic studies whereby serial changes in BNP and NT-proBNP concentrations were obtained to evaluate the therapeutic success of short-term (inpatient) and long-term (outpatient) management. The use of RCV may also be important in studies comparing BNP-guided versus physician-guided HF drug therapy.
Conclusions: Relative to the RCV, short-term therapeutic studies of inpatients have largely resulted in a statistically significant decline in BNP and NT-proBNP with clinical evidence of patient improvements. In contrast, many therapeutic studies involving long-term outpatient monitoring have produced changes in BNP/NT-proBNP that do not exceed the biologic variances. The value of BNP for monitoring therapeutic success can be questioned for trials that demonstrate clinical benefit without statistically significant decreases in biomarker levels.