Pregnancy loss rates after midtrimester amniocentesis
- PMID: 17077226
- DOI: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000240135.13594.07
Pregnancy loss rates after midtrimester amniocentesis
Abstract
Objective: The purpose of this study was to quantify the contemporary procedure-related loss rate after midtrimester amniocentesis using a database generated from patients who were recruited to the First And Second Trimester Evaluation of Risk for Aneuploidy trial.
Methods: A total of 35,003 unselected patients from the general population with viable singleton pregnancies were enrolled in the First And Second Trimester Evaluation of Risk for Aneuploidy trial between 10 3/7 and 13 6/7 weeks gestation and followed up prospectively for complete pregnancy outcome information. Patients who either did (study group, n=3,096) or did not (control group, n=31,907) undergo midtrimester amniocentesis were identified from the database. The rate of fetal loss less than 24 weeks of gestation was compared between the two groups, and multiple logistic regression analysis was used to adjust for potential confounders.
Results: The spontaneous fetal loss rate less than 24 weeks of gestation in the study group was 1.0% and was not statistically different from the background 0.94% rate seen in the control group (P=.74, 95% confidence interval -0.26%, 0.49%). The procedure-related loss rate after amniocentesis was 0.06% (1.0% minus the background rate of 0.94%). Women undergoing amniocentesis were 1.1 times more likely to have a spontaneous loss (95% confidence interval 0.7-1.5).
Conclusion: The procedure-related fetal loss rate after midtrimester amniocentesis performed on patients in a contemporary prospective clinical trial was 0.06%. There was no significant difference in loss rates between those undergoing amniocentesis and those not undergoing amniocentesis.
Level of evidence: II-2.
Comment in
-
Pregnancy loss rates after midtrimester amniocentesis.Obstet Gynecol. 2007 Feb;109(2 Pt 1):451-2; author reply 452-3. doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000255003.92255.7a. Obstet Gynecol. 2007. PMID: 17267851 No abstract available.
-
Pregnancy loss rates after midtrimester amniocentesis.Obstet Gynecol. 2007 Feb;109(2 Pt 1):451; author reply 452-3. doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000255004.48681.4d. Obstet Gynecol. 2007. PMID: 17267852 No abstract available.
-
Pregnancy loss rates after midtrimester amniocentesis.Obstet Gynecol. 2007 Feb;109(2 Pt 1):452; author reply 452-3. doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000244693.92097.3b. Obstet Gynecol. 2007. PMID: 17267853 No abstract available.
-
Pregnancy loss rates after midtrimester amniocentesis.Obstet Gynecol. 2007 Mar;109(3):780; author reply 780-1. doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000257880.87445.e7. Obstet Gynecol. 2007. PMID: 17329535 No abstract available.
-
Pregnancy loss rates after midtrimester amniocentesis.Obstet Gynecol. 2007 Mar;109(3):780; author reply 780-1. doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000257899.01092.fe. Obstet Gynecol. 2007. PMID: 17329536 No abstract available.
-
Pregnancy loss rates after midtrimester amniocentesis.Obstet Gynecol. 2007 May;109(5):1203-4; author reply 1204. doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000263773.19452.7d. Obstet Gynecol. 2007. PMID: 17470607 No abstract available.
-
After midtrimester amniocentesis the risk of spontaneous pregnancy loss was 6 per 10,000.Evid Based Med. 2007 Jun;12(3):85. doi: 10.1136/ebm.12.3.85. Evid Based Med. 2007. PMID: 17537893 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Revisiting the fetal loss rate after second-trimester genetic amniocentesis: a single center's 16-year experience.Obstet Gynecol. 2008 Mar;111(3):589-95. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e318162eb53. Obstet Gynecol. 2008. PMID: 18310360
-
Risk factors for procedure-related fetal losses after mid-trimester genetic amniocentesis.Prenat Diagn. 2006 Oct;26(10):925-30. doi: 10.1002/pd.1528. Prenat Diagn. 2006. PMID: 16838383
-
Diagnostic mid trimester amniocentesis: how safe?Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2004 Aug;191(2):607-15. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2004.05.078. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2004. PMID: 15343248 Review.
-
Individual risk of fetal loss following routine second trimester amniocentesis: a controlled study of 20,460 cases.Ultraschall Med. 2008 Apr;29(2):165-72. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-963217. Epub 2007 Jun 29. Ultraschall Med. 2008. PMID: 17602371
-
Estimating the spontaneous loss of Down syndrome fetuses between the times of chorionic villus sampling, amniocentesis and livebirth.Prenat Diagn. 1998 Oct;18(10):1045-54. Prenat Diagn. 1998. PMID: 9826896 Review.
Cited by
-
Invasive Prenatal Diagnostic Testing for Aneuploidies in Singleton Pregnancies: A Comparative Review of Major Guidelines.Medicina (Kaunas). 2022 Oct 17;58(10):1472. doi: 10.3390/medicina58101472. Medicina (Kaunas). 2022. PMID: 36295632 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Pregnancy Loss After Amniocentesis and Chorionic Villus Sampling: Cohort Study.Zdr Varst. 2020 Dec 31;60(1):25-29. doi: 10.2478/sjph-2021-0005. eCollection 2020 Dec. Zdr Varst. 2020. PMID: 33488819 Free PMC article.
-
Noninvasive Prenatal Testing - When Is It Advantageous to Apply.Biomed Hub. 2017 Mar 4;2(1):1-11. doi: 10.1159/000458432. eCollection 2017 Jan-Apr. Biomed Hub. 2017. PMID: 31988902 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Single or double needle insertion in twin's amniocentesis: Does the technique influence the risk of complications?Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol X. 2019 May 15;3:100051. doi: 10.1016/j.eurox.2019.100051. eCollection 2019 Jul. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol X. 2019. PMID: 31403133 Free PMC article.
-
Does Chorionic Villus Sampling Increase the Risk of Preeclampsia or Gestational Hypertension?Int J Prev Med. 2019 Feb 12;10:24. doi: 10.4103/ijpvm.IJPVM_83_16. eCollection 2019. Int J Prev Med. 2019. PMID: 30820311 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Research Materials
