Colonoscopy in colorectal-cancer screening for detection of advanced neoplasia
- PMID: 17079760
- DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa054967
Colonoscopy in colorectal-cancer screening for detection of advanced neoplasia
Abstract
Background: Recommendations for colorectal-cancer screening are based solely on age and family history of cancer, not sex.
Methods: We performed a cross-sectional analysis of the data from a large colonoscopy-based screening program that included 50,148 participants who were 40 to 66 years of age. People 40 to 49 years of age were eligible only if they had a family history of cancer of any type. Of the 43,042 participants 50 to 66 years of age, 13.3% reported a family history of colorectal cancer, as did 66.3% of the 7106 participants who were 40 to 49 years of age. We defined advanced neoplasia as cancer or adenoma that was at least 10 mm in diameter, had high-grade dysplasia, or had villous or tubulovillous histologic characteristics, or any combination thereof. We used multivariate logistic regression to identify associations between participants' characteristics and advanced neoplasia in a primary (or derivation) data set, and we confirmed the associations in a secondary (or validation) data set.
Results: Advanced neoplasia was detected in 2553 (5.9%) participants 50 to 66 years of age and in 243 (3.4%) participants 40 to 49 years of age. The rate of complications during colonoscopy was 0.1%, and no participants died. In the validation set, a logistic-regression model showed that male sex was independently associated with advanced neoplasia (adjusted odds ratio, 1.73; 95% confidence interval, 1.52 to 1.98; P<0.001). In each age group (40 to 49 years, 50 to 54 years, 55 to 59 years, and 60 to 66 years), the number of persons who would have to undergo colorectal-cancer screening in order to detect one advanced neoplasia was significantly lower in men than in women (23 vs. 36, 17 vs. 28, 12 vs. 22, and 10 vs. 18, respectively).
Conclusions: We detected advanced neoplasia at a significantly higher rate in men than in women, which may warrant refinement of the screening recommendations for colorectal cancer.
Copyright 2006 Massachusetts Medical Society.
Comment in
-
Colonoscopy screening for detection of advanced neoplasia.N Engl J Med. 2007 Feb 8;356(6):632; author reply 633-4. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc063405. N Engl J Med. 2007. PMID: 17287485 No abstract available.
-
Colonoscopy screening for detection of advanced neoplasia.N Engl J Med. 2007 Feb 8;356(6):633; author reply 633-4. N Engl J Med. 2007. PMID: 17288050 No abstract available.
-
Colonoscopy screening for detection of advanced neoplasia.N Engl J Med. 2007 Feb 8;356(6):632-3; author reply 633-4. N Engl J Med. 2007. PMID: 17290510 No abstract available.
-
Should recommendations for colorectal-cancer screening be changed?Nat Clin Pract Oncol. 2007 Jul;4(7):392-3. doi: 10.1038/ncponc0843. Epub 2007 May 22. Nat Clin Pract Oncol. 2007. PMID: 17519918 No abstract available.
-
Refining colorectal cancer screening recommendations based on gender.Gastroenterology. 2007 Jun;132(7):2605-6. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2007.04.054. Gastroenterology. 2007. PMID: 17570233 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Effectiveness of a colonoscopic screening programme in first-degree relatives of patients with colorectal cancer.Colorectal Dis. 2011 Jun;13(6):e145-53. doi: 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2011.02577.x. Colorectal Dis. 2011. PMID: 21564467
-
Risk of advanced proximal neoplasms in asymptomatic adults according to the distal colorectal findings.N Engl J Med. 2000 Jul 20;343(3):169-74. doi: 10.1056/NEJM200007203430302. N Engl J Med. 2000. PMID: 10900275
-
Use of colonoscopy to screen asymptomatic adults for colorectal cancer. Veterans Affairs Cooperative Study Group 380.N Engl J Med. 2000 Jul 20;343(3):162-8. doi: 10.1056/NEJM200007203430301. N Engl J Med. 2000. PMID: 10900274
-
Gender as a risk factor for advanced neoplasia and colorectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2009 Jun;7(6):676-81.e1-3. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2009.01.008. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2009. PMID: 19514116 Review.
-
European initiatives in colorectal cancer screening.Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2011 Mar;23(3):201-3. doi: 10.1097/MEG.0b013e328343d3cc. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2011. PMID: 21304316 Review. No abstract available.
Cited by
-
Risk prediction of advanced colorectal neoplasia varies by race and neighbourhood socioeconomic status.Fam Med Community Health. 2024 May 30;12(Suppl 2):e002892. doi: 10.1136/fmch-2024-002892. Fam Med Community Health. 2024. PMID: 39574362 Free PMC article.
-
A novel index combining fecal immunochemical test, DNA test, and age improves detection of advanced colorectal adenoma.Cancer Sci. 2024 Nov;115(11):3682-3694. doi: 10.1111/cas.16322. Epub 2024 Aug 24. Cancer Sci. 2024. PMID: 39180368 Free PMC article.
-
Optimal timing of a colonoscopy screening schedule depends on adenoma detection, adenoma risk, adherence to screening and the screening objective: A microsimulation study.PLoS One. 2024 May 24;19(5):e0304374. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0304374. eCollection 2024. PLoS One. 2024. PMID: 38787836 Free PMC article.
-
Is annual screening by fecal immunochemical test necessary after a recent colonoscopy?DEN Open. 2024 May 20;5(1):e385. doi: 10.1002/deo2.385. eCollection 2025 Apr. DEN Open. 2024. PMID: 38770399 Free PMC article.
-
Engineering tumor-colonizing E. coli Nissle 1917 for detection and treatment of colorectal neoplasia.Nat Commun. 2024 Jan 20;15(1):646. doi: 10.1038/s41467-024-44776-4. Nat Commun. 2024. PMID: 38245513 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical