Statistical learning within and between modalities: pitting abstract against stimulus-specific representations
- PMID: 17100792
- DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01801.x
Statistical learning within and between modalities: pitting abstract against stimulus-specific representations
Abstract
When learners encode sequential patterns and generalize their knowledge to novel instances, are they relying on abstract or stimulus-specific representations? Research on artificial grammar learning (AGL) has shown transfer of learning from one stimulus set to another, and such findings have encouraged the view that statistical learning is mediated by abstract representations that are independent of the sense modality or perceptual features of the stimuli. Using a novel modification of the standard AGL paradigm, we obtained data to the contrary. These experiments pitted abstract processing against stimulus-specific learning. The findings show that statistical learning results in knowledge that is stimulus-specific rather than abstract. They show furthermore that learning can proceed in parallel for multiple input streams along separate perceptual dimensions or sense modalities. We conclude that learning sequential structure and generalizing to novel stimuli inherently involve learning mechanisms that are closely tied to the perceptual characteristics of the input.
Similar articles
-
Interactions between encoding and retrieval in the domain of sequence-learning.J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2006 Jan;32(1):118-30. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.32.1.118. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2006. PMID: 16478345
-
What is learned about fragments in artificial grammar learning? A transitional probabilities approach.Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2009 May;62(5):868-76. doi: 10.1080/17470210802511188. Epub 2008 Dec 6. Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2009. PMID: 19065286
-
Strengthening the case for stimulus-specificity in artificial grammar learning: no evidence for abstract representations with extended exposure.Exp Psychol. 2009;56(3):188-97. doi: 10.1027/1618-3169.56.3.188. Exp Psychol. 2009. PMID: 19289361
-
Categorization of visual stimuli in the honeybee Apis mellifera.Anim Cogn. 2006 Oct;9(4):257-70. doi: 10.1007/s10071-006-0032-9. Epub 2006 Aug 15. Anim Cogn. 2006. PMID: 16909238 Review.
-
How does the brain learn environmental structure? Ten core principles for understanding the neurocognitive mechanisms of statistical learning.Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2020 May;112:279-299. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2020.01.032. Epub 2020 Feb 1. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2020. PMID: 32018038 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Concurrent visual sequence learning.Psychol Res. 2023 Oct;87(7):2086-2100. doi: 10.1007/s00426-023-01810-2. Epub 2023 Mar 22. Psychol Res. 2023. PMID: 36947194 Free PMC article.
-
Differential Gaze Patterns on Eyes and Mouth During Audiovisual Speech Segmentation.Front Psychol. 2016 Feb 2;7:52. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00052. eCollection 2016. Front Psychol. 2016. PMID: 26869959 Free PMC article.
-
Crossmodal interactions in human learning and memory.Front Hum Neurosci. 2023 May 17;17:1181760. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2023.1181760. eCollection 2023. Front Hum Neurosci. 2023. PMID: 37266327 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Dynamic encoding of phonetic categories in zebra finch auditory forebrain.Sci Rep. 2023 Jul 10;13(1):11172. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-37982-5. Sci Rep. 2023. PMID: 37430030 Free PMC article.
-
Domain-general mechanisms for speech segmentation: The role of duration information in language learning.J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2017 Mar;43(3):466-476. doi: 10.1037/xhp0000325. Epub 2016 Nov 28. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2017. PMID: 27893268 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
