Skip to main page content
Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2007 Jan;52(1):149-60.
doi: 10.1007/s10620-006-9506-5. Epub 2006 Nov 16.

Endoscopic Doppler Ultrasound Versus Endoscopic Stigmata-Directed Management of Acute Peptic Ulcer Hemorrhage: A Multimodel Cost Analysis

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Endoscopic Doppler Ultrasound Versus Endoscopic Stigmata-Directed Management of Acute Peptic Ulcer Hemorrhage: A Multimodel Cost Analysis

Victor K Chen et al. Dig Dis Sci. .

Erratum in

  • Dig Dis Sci. 2007 Jan;52(1):161

Abstract

Recurrent bleeding from acute peptic ulcer hemorrhage is problematic. Studies have shown that Doppler ultrasound (DOP-US) is useful in decreasing rebleeding. We analyzed associated costs and outcomes to better define the role of DOP-US versus Conventional (Forrest classification endoscopic stigmata) in the management of acute peptic ulcer bleeding. Two separate decision analyses were constructed. Recurrent bleeding, failed esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) hemostasis, complications, and surgery rates were derived from medical literature. Costs were based on Medicare data. DOP-US is preferred over Conventional in acute peptic ulcer bleeding with average cost savings per patient ranging from 853 dollars (decision-tree modeling) to 1,160 dollars (Monte Carlo simulation). High-dose intravenous proton-pump inhibitors lowered rates of recurrent bleeding for both Conventional and DOP-US, resulting in a lower but still persistent average cost savings per patient for DOP-US (decision-tree modeling = 328 dollars, Monte Carlo simulation = 560 dollars). This decision analyses identified DOP-US as the preferred cost-minimizing strategy in acute peptic ulcer hemorrhage. Results of cost analyses were most dependent on hospitalization costs and recurrent bleeding rates.

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by 5 articles

References

    1. Natl Inst Health Consens Dev Conf Consens Statement. 1989 Mar 6-8;7(6):1-7 - PubMed
    1. Gastrointest Endosc. 2000 Sep;52(3):315-21 - PubMed
    1. Ann Intern Med. 2003 Nov 18;139(10):843-57 - PubMed
    1. N Engl J Med. 1994 Sep 15;331(11):717-27 - PubMed
    1. Gastrointest Endosc. 2004 Nov;60(5):804-12 - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Substances

LinkOut - more resources

Feedback