Succinylcholine or rocuronium? A meta-analysis of the effects on intubation conditions

Int J Clin Pract. 2006 Dec;60(12):1638-46. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-1241.2005.00685.x.

Abstract

This meta-analysis was undertaken to compare the effects of succinylcholine (SCH) and rocuronium (RCR) on endotracheal intubation (ETI) conditions. Eligible randomised controlled trials (RCTs) were identified via medline and a manual search of references. The frequencies of excellent and unacceptable ETI conditions in subjects receiving SCH 1.0-1.5 mg/kg and RCR 0.6-1.2 mg/kg were determined using standard statistical methods. Inclusion criteria were met by 16 RCTs, representing 1362 subjects. SCH was associated with a 17.7% increase (95% CI = 13-22) in the frequency of excellent ETI conditions and a 5.1% decrease (95% CI = -7.3 to -2.9) in the frequency of unacceptable ETI conditions, when compared with RCR. In the subgroup undergoing true rapid sequence intubation, SCH was associated with a 19.1% increase (95% CI = 13.7-24.5) in the frequency of excellent ETI conditions. SCH appears to be superior to RCR in creating excellent ETI conditions and avoiding unacceptable ETI conditions.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study
  • Meta-Analysis
  • Review

MeSH terms

  • Androstanols / therapeutic use*
  • Humans
  • Intubation, Intratracheal / methods*
  • Neuromuscular Depolarizing Agents / therapeutic use*
  • Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
  • Rocuronium
  • Succinylcholine / therapeutic use*

Substances

  • Androstanols
  • Neuromuscular Depolarizing Agents
  • Succinylcholine
  • Rocuronium