Mammalian embryo co-culture: trials and tribulations of a misunderstood method
- PMID: 17118433
- DOI: 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2006.10.011
Mammalian embryo co-culture: trials and tribulations of a misunderstood method
Abstract
Embryo-somatic cell co-culture was devised over 40 years ago in an attempt to improve the development and viability of mammalian preimplantation embryos generated and cultured in vitro. While initial endeavours were successful in this respect, other studies soon highlighted a number of significant long-term detrimental impacts of this approach. Surprisingly little is known about the mechanisms underlying the beneficial effects of co-culture, although the production of embryotrophic compounds, modulation of nutrient profile, protection against culture-induced stress and/or toxin clearance are all contenders. The extent to which the inadvertent exposure of embryos to serum accounts for many of these effects remains open to question. Although the popularity of somatic cell co-culture has recently declined in favour of the use of sequential media due to concerns associated with its risk of disease transmission and long-term sequelae, we argue that complete dismissal of this technique is ill advised, given that our limited understanding of basic somatic cell interactions has prevented us from fully exploiting its potential. In this respect, there is some merit in focussing future research strategies based on reconstructed maternal tract tissue. Although the use of co-culture in clinical practice is unacceptable and its implementation in domestic species for commercial purposes should be viewed with diffidence, this technique can still provide a wealth of information on the development of novel, more physiological embryo in vitro culture systems. The proviso for acquiring such information is to gain a fuller understanding of the culture requirements/biochemistry of somatic cells and their interaction with the early conceptus.
Similar articles
-
In vitro production of bovine embryos in medium supplemented with a serum replacer: effects on blastocyst development, cryotolerance and survival to term.Theriogenology. 2007 Dec;68(9):1316-25. doi: 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2007.08.034. Epub 2007 Oct 10. Theriogenology. 2007. PMID: 17931700
-
[Co-culture of embryos: influencing factors and mechanisms of action].Sheng Wu Gong Cheng Xue Bao. 2003 Jul;19(4):502-5. Sheng Wu Gong Cheng Xue Bao. 2003. PMID: 15969074 Review. Chinese.
-
Reduced quality of bovine embryos cultured in media conditioned by exposure to an inflamed endometrium.Aust Vet J. 2008 Aug;86(8):312-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1751-0813.2008.00326.x. Aust Vet J. 2008. PMID: 18673472
-
Development of serum-free culture systems for the ruminant embryo and subsequent assessment of embryo viability.J Reprod Fertil Suppl. 1999;54:461-75. J Reprod Fertil Suppl. 1999. PMID: 10692876 Review.
-
Short-term and long-term effects of embryo culture in the surrogate sheep oviduct versus in vitro culture for different domestic species.Theriogenology. 2010 Apr 1;73(6):748-57. doi: 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2009.08.001. Epub 2009 Sep 1. Theriogenology. 2010. PMID: 19726075 Review.
Cited by
-
Embryo-luteal cells co-culture: an in vitro model to evaluate steroidogenic and prostanoid bovine early embryo-maternal interactions.In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Anim. 2013 Feb;49(2):134-46. doi: 10.1007/s11626-012-9577-x. Epub 2013 Jan 29. In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Anim. 2013. PMID: 23358866
-
Fighting Like Cats and Dogs: Challenges in Domestic Carnivore Oocyte Development and Promises of Innovative Culture Systems.Animals (Basel). 2021 Jul 19;11(7):2135. doi: 10.3390/ani11072135. Animals (Basel). 2021. PMID: 34359262 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Metabolomic Analysis Evidences That Uterine Epithelial Cells Enhance Blastocyst Development in a Microfluidic Device.Cells. 2021 May 13;10(5):1194. doi: 10.3390/cells10051194. Cells. 2021. PMID: 34068340 Free PMC article.
-
Development of a bovine luteal cell in vitro culture system suitable for co-culture with early embryos.In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Anim. 2012 Oct;48(9):583-92. doi: 10.1007/s11626-012-9552-6. Epub 2012 Oct 10. In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Anim. 2012. PMID: 23054443
-
Epithelial cell coculture models for studying infectious diseases: benefits and limitations.J Biomed Biotechnol. 2011;2011:852419. doi: 10.1155/2011/852419. Epub 2011 Oct 5. J Biomed Biotechnol. 2011. PMID: 22007147 Free PMC article. Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
