Lessons from history: why race and ethnicity have played a major role in biomedical research

J Law Med Ethics. 2006 Fall;34(3):487-96, 479. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-720x.2006.00060.x.

Abstract

Before any citizen enters the role of scientist, medical practitioner, lawyer, epidemiologist, and so on, each and all grow up in a society in which the categories of human differentiation are folk categories that organize perceptions, relations, and behavior. That was true during slavery, during Reconstruction, the eugenics period, the two World Wars, and is no less true today. While every period understandably claims to transcend those categories, medicine, law, and science are profoundly and demonstrably influenced by the embedded folk notions of race and ethnicity.

Publication types

  • Historical Article

MeSH terms

  • Anthropology, Cultural / ethics
  • Anthropology, Cultural / history
  • Biological Evolution
  • Biomedical Research / ethics
  • Biomedical Research / history*
  • Biomedical Research / legislation & jurisprudence
  • Black or African American / genetics
  • Black or African American / psychology
  • Civil Rights / history
  • Civil Rights / legislation & jurisprudence
  • Criminal Psychology
  • Culture
  • Ethical Analysis
  • Ethnicity* / genetics
  • Ethnicity* / psychology
  • Genetic Research / ethics
  • History, 19th Century
  • History, 20th Century
  • Humans
  • Patient Selection / ethics*
  • Prejudice*
  • Racial Groups* / ethnology
  • Racial Groups* / genetics
  • Racial Groups* / psychology
  • Social Problems / ethnology
  • Social Problems / history
  • Sociology, Medical / ethics
  • Sociology, Medical / history*
  • United States
  • Violence / ethnology